Literature DB >> 35786772

Is the routine use of systemic antibiotics after spine surgery warranted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

José Manuel Orenday-Barraza1, María José Cavagnaro2, Mauricio J Avila3, Isabel Martha Strouse2, Dara S Farhadi2, Aaron Dowell2, Naushaba Khan2, Pedro Aguilar-Salinas3, Robert Ravinsky4, Ali A Baaj2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the published literature supports the current practice of utilizing antibiotics postoperatively in spine surgery.
METHODS: A systematic review from PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials databases was performed. Search terms used: "Antibiotic Prophylaxis"[Mesh], antibiotic*, antibacterial*, "Spine"[Mesh], "Surgical Procedures, Operative"[Mesh]. Only comparative, clinical studies were included. Those studies with surgical site infection (SSI) criteria that were not similar to the CDC definition were excluded. A meta-analysis for overall SSI was performed. A subgroup analysis was also performed to analyze the outcomes specifically on instrumented groups of patients. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR). Forest plots were used to display RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included (four Randomized-Controlled Trials, three prospective cohorts, and six retrospective). Three different perioperative strategies were used in the selected studies: Group 1: preoperative antibiotic administration (PreopAbx) versus PreopAbx and any type of postoperative antibiotic administration (Pre + postopAbx) (n = 6 studies; 7849 patients); Group 2: Pre + postopAbx ≤ 24 h versus Pre + postopAbx > 24 h (n = 6; 1982); and Group 3: Pre + postopAbx ≤ 48 h versus. Pre + postopAbx ≤ 72 h (n = 1; 502). The meta-analysis performed on Groups 1 and 2 did not show significant effects (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.77, 2.09, and RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.64, 1.46, respectively).
CONCLUSION: A meta-analysis and comprehensive review of the literature show that the routine use of postoperative antibiotics in spine surgery may not be effective in preventing surgical site infections.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic prophylaxis; Meta-analysis; Spine surgery; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35786772     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  22 in total

Review 1.  Spine update: antimicrobial prophylaxis in spine surgery: basic principles and recent advances.

Authors:  J B Dimick; P A Lipsett; J P Kostuik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

3.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections Following Neurosurgical Spinal Fusion Operations: A Case Control Study.

Authors:  Thomas L Walsh; Ashley M Querry; Sheila McCool; Alison L Galdys; Kathleen A Shutt; Melissa I Saul; Carlene A Muto
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  The Effect of Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Administration on the Rate of Infection in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Surgery Requiring a Closed-Suction Drain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer C Urquhart; Darryl Collings; Lori Nutt; Linda Kuska; Kevin R Gurr; Fawaz Siddiqi; Parham Rasoulinejad; Alyssa Fleming; Joanne Collie; Christopher S Bailey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in Spine Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew V Abola; Charles C Lin; Lawrence J Lin; William Schreiber-Stainthorp; Anthony Frempong-Boadu; Aaron J Buckland; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A single-center intervention to discontinue postoperative antibiotics after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Ariane Lewis; Jessica Lin; Herbert James; Anne Clara Krok; Nicole Zeoli; Janine Healy; Tyler Lewis; Donato Pacione
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery: a comparison of single-dose and 72-hour protocols.

Authors:  A Maciejczak; A Wolan-Nieroda; M Wałaszek; M Kołpa; Z Wolak
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Cefuroxime prophylaxis is effective in noninstrumented spine surgery: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Christiane Petignat; Patrick Francioli; Stephan Harbarth; Luca Regli; François Porchet; Alain Reverdin; Benedict Rilliet; Nicolas de Tribolet; André Pannatier; Didier Pittet; Giorgio Zanetti
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of 24-Hour and 72-Hour Dosages.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Marimuthu; Vineet Thomas Abraham; Mirunalini Ravichandran; Rajamani Achimuthu
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08

10.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.