BACKGROUND: Parental smoking has been associated with increased rates of sudden infant death syndrome, low birth weight, otitis media, asthma, and decreased lung growth. No prior parent surveys have assessed national rates of screening and counseling for parental tobacco use in the context of their child's visit to primary care. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare rates of pediatrician and family practitioner screening and counseling for parental smoking. Design/Methods. Data were collected by telephone survey of households from July to September 2001. The sample is weighted by race and gender based on 1999 US Census estimates to be representative of the US population. RESULTS: Of 3566 eligible respondents contacted, 3002 (84%) completed surveys; 902 of those were parents who had a child seen by a pediatrician (62%) or family practitioner (38%) in the past year. About half of all parents who visited a pediatrician or family practitioner reported that they had been asked about household member smoking status (52% vs 48%). More parents who visited pediatricians had been asked if they had rules prohibiting smoking in the home than those who visited family practitioners (38% vs 29%). Of 190 (21%) parents who were smokers, fewer than half reported being counseled by either specialty about dangers of second-hand smoke (41% vs 33%) or risks of modeling smoking behavior (31% vs 28%). Similarly, fewer than half of parental smokers received advice to quit (36% vs 45%). CONCLUSION: Overall rates of screening and counseling for parental smoking in pediatric and family practice are low. Despite some differences between specialties, significant opportunities exist to improve tobacco control activities in primary care settings that serve children.
BACKGROUND: Parental smoking has been associated with increased rates of sudden infant death syndrome, low birth weight, otitis media, asthma, and decreased lung growth. No prior parent surveys have assessed national rates of screening and counseling for parental tobacco use in the context of their child's visit to primary care. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare rates of pediatrician and family practitioner screening and counseling for parental smoking. Design/Methods. Data were collected by telephone survey of households from July to September 2001. The sample is weighted by race and gender based on 1999 US Census estimates to be representative of the US population. RESULTS: Of 3566 eligible respondents contacted, 3002 (84%) completed surveys; 902 of those were parents who had a child seen by a pediatrician (62%) or family practitioner (38%) in the past year. About half of all parents who visited a pediatrician or family practitioner reported that they had been asked about household member smoking status (52% vs 48%). More parents who visited pediatricians had been asked if they had rules prohibiting smoking in the home than those who visited family practitioners (38% vs 29%). Of 190 (21%) parents who were smokers, fewer than half reported being counseled by either specialty about dangers of second-hand smoke (41% vs 33%) or risks of modeling smoking behavior (31% vs 28%). Similarly, fewer than half of parental smokers received advice to quit (36% vs 45%). CONCLUSION: Overall rates of screening and counseling for parental smoking in pediatric and family practice are low. Despite some differences between specialties, significant opportunities exist to improve tobacco control activities in primary care settings that serve children.
Authors: Norman Hymowitz; Joseph V Schwab; Christopher Keith Haddock; Sara A Pyle; Lisa M Schwab Journal: Prev Med Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jonathan P Winickoff; Emara Nabi-Burza; Yuchiao Chang; Susan Regan; Jeremy Drehmer; Stacia Finch; Richard Wasserman; Deborah Ossip; Bethany Hipple; Heide Woo; Jonathan Klein; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jonathan P Winickoff; Robert C McMillen; Donna M Vallone; Jennifer L Pearson; Susanne E Tanski; Janelle H Dempsey; Jonathan D Klein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jonathan P Winickoff; Elyse R Park; Bethany J Hipple; Anna Berkowitz; Cecilia Vieira; Joan Friebely; Erica A Healey; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jill S Halterman; Belinda Borrelli; Paul Tremblay; Kelly M Conn; Maria Fagnano; Guillermo Montes; Telva Hernandez Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 7.124