OBJECTIVE: To examine strict smoke-free home policies among smoking parents assessed in pediatric offices. METHODS: We analyzed baseline parental survey data from 10 control practices in a national trial of pediatric office-based tobacco control interventions (Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure, CEASE). We used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to examine factors associated with strict smoke-free home policies. RESULTS: Subjects were 952 parents who were current smokers. Just over half (54.3%) reported strict smoke-free home policies. Few reported being asked (19.9%) or advised (17.1%) regarding policies by pediatricians. Factors associated with higher odds of policies were child 5 years or younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53, 3.86), nonblack race/ethnicity (aORs 2.17-2.60, 95% CIs 1.25-5.00), non-Medicaid (HMO/private (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.31, 2.58); self-pay/other aOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.12, 2.78); well-child versus sick child visit (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11, 2.34), fewer than 10 cigarettes per day (aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31, 2.47), no other home smokers (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.26, 2.25), only father smoking (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.06, 2.83), and strict smoke-free car policy (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 2.19, 5.64). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of smoking parents did not have strict smoke-free home policies. Parents were less likely to report policies if they were heavier smokers, black, living with other smokers, or attending a sick child visit; if they did not have a young child or smoke-free car policy; if they had a child on Medicaid; and if anyone other than only the father smoked. Few pediatricians addressed or recommended strict smoke-free home policies in an office visit. The pediatric office encounter represents a currently missed opportunity to intervene regarding smoke-free homes, particularly for high-risk groups.
OBJECTIVE: To examine strict smoke-free home policies among smoking parents assessed in pediatric offices. METHODS: We analyzed baseline parental survey data from 10 control practices in a national trial of pediatric office-based tobacco control interventions (Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure, CEASE). We used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to examine factors associated with strict smoke-free home policies. RESULTS: Subjects were 952 parents who were current smokers. Just over half (54.3%) reported strict smoke-free home policies. Few reported being asked (19.9%) or advised (17.1%) regarding policies by pediatricians. Factors associated with higher odds of policies were child 5 years or younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53, 3.86), nonblack race/ethnicity (aORs 2.17-2.60, 95% CIs 1.25-5.00), non-Medicaid (HMO/private (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.31, 2.58); self-pay/other aOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.12, 2.78); well-child versus sick child visit (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11, 2.34), fewer than 10 cigarettes per day (aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.31, 2.47), no other home smokers (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.26, 2.25), only father smoking (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.06, 2.83), and strict smoke-free car policy (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 2.19, 5.64). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of smoking parents did not have strict smoke-free home policies. Parents were less likely to report policies if they were heavier smokers, black, living with other smokers, or attending a sick child visit; if they did not have a young child or smoke-free car policy; if they had a child on Medicaid; and if anyone other than only the father smoked. Few pediatricians addressed or recommended strict smoke-free home policies in an office visit. The pediatric office encounter represents a currently missed opportunity to intervene regarding smoke-free homes, particularly for high-risk groups.
Authors: Harry A Lando; Bethany J Hipple; Myra Muramoto; Jonathan D Klein; Alexander V Prokhorov; Deborah J Ossip; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Cheryl Higbee; Mark J Travers; Amy Van Deusen; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Brian King; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jonathan P Winickoff; Elyse R Park; Bethany J Hipple; Anna Berkowitz; Cecilia Vieira; Joan Friebely; Erica A Healey; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Brian A King; Andrew J Hyland; Ron Borland; Ann McNeill; K Michael Cummings Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stacia A Finch; Richard Wasserman; Emara Nabi-Burza; Bethany Hipple; Robert Oldendick; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Deborah J Ossip; Tye Johnson; Vanessa Assibey-Mensah; Sijiu Wang; Donald McLaren; Karen Calabro; Alexander V Prokhorov; Scott McIntosh Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2017-12-04
Authors: Jeremy E Drehmer; Emara Nabi-Burza; Bethany Hipple Walters; Deborah J Ossip; Douglas E Levy; Nancy A Rigotti; Jonathan D Klein; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jeremy E Drehmer; Deborah J Ossip; Emara Nabi-Burza; Bethany Hipple Walters; Julie A Gorzkowski; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Bryanne N Colvin; Margaret G Parker; Sunah S Hwang; Emma S Forbes; Kyria Brown; Eve R Colson Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Yun Wang; Mei Yang; Lang Tian; Zhiqiang Huang; Faming Chen; Jingsong Hu; Fuzhi Wang; Gui Chen; Shuiyuan Xiao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.390