Literature DB >> 14589493

One- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the effect of plate fixation.

Michael J Bolesta1, Glenn R Rechtine, Ann Marie Chrin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The success of arthrodesis for anterior cervical fusion depends on several factors, including the number of surgical levels. Internal fixation putatively improves the arthrodesis rate and outcome.
PURPOSE: To provide medium-term follow-up data on the surgical success and patient outcome of one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomies and fusions and to determine the effect that plate fixation has on results. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study of 40 patients who underwent modified Smith-Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at one or two operative levels. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Odom criteria, Nurick grading system, radiographs.
METHODS: Forty patients, with an average age of 44 years (range, 27 to 82), were followed for an average of 51 months (range, 24 to 85). All had an anterior discectomy, burring of the end plates and placement of an autogenous tricortical iliac crest graft at one (20 patients) or two levels (20 patients). Twenty-three were stabilized with the Cervical Spine Locking Plate (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA), 4 single level, 19 two level. All patients had follow-up office visits with examinations and radiographs. Radiographic union, postoperative pain relief and neurologic recovery were evaluated.
RESULTS: Successful arthrodesis of single-level procedures occurred in 11 of 16 unplated and 2 of 4 plated fusions. Primary bony union in the two-level group was achieved in 15 of 19 plated patients and did not occur in the single unplated procedure. Clinically, there were 12 excellent, 5 good, 3 satisfactory and 0 poor outcomes among the single-level procedures. Among the dual-level procedures, there were 10 excellent, 5 good, 3 satisfactory and 2 poor results. Nine of 16 who developed adjacent-level degeneration had pain. Five of the 9 also had nonunions. Of the 40, 3 had fibrous union at final follow-up, and 10 had revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cervical Spine Locking Plate improved the outcome of two-level procedures to that of uninstrumented one-level fusions. Adjacent-level degeneration is associated with persistent pain, especially if there is also a nonunion. Primary bony union is paralleled by a better clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14589493     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00186-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  18 in total

1.  Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Betsy E Smith; Leonidas G Nikolakakos; Charles H Richardson; Hugh F Smisson; Joe S Robinson; David C Parish
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Load sharing mechanism across graft-bone interface in static cervical locking plate fixation.

Authors:  In Ho Han; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Byung Ho Jin; Yong Eun Cho; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-04-30

3.  Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yong-Hun Joo; Jong-Won Lee; Ki-Young Kwon; Jong-Joo Rhee; Hyun-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

4.  Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 2: Clinical Results at 7-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; David A Cavanaugh; Phillip Andrew Utter; Peter G Campbell; Rishi Wadhwa; Kelly A Frank; Kyle E Marshall; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

Review 6.  Failure in Cervical Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.

Authors:  Terence Verla; David S Xu; Matthew J Davis; Edward M Reece; Michelle Kelly; Mervin Nunez; Sebastian J Winocour; Alexander E Ropper
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft.

Authors:  Abdul Fettah Buyuk; Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Christian J Gaffney; Amir A Mehbod; John M Dawson; Timothy A Garvey; Benjamin Mueller; James D Schwender
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

8.  Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable cervical spacers and low-dose rhBMP-2 in multi-level ACDF.

Authors:  Kaveh Khajavi; Alessandria Shen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Deuk Laser Disc Repair(®) is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Ara J Deukmedjian; S T Jason Cutright; Pa-C Augusto Cianciabella; Arias Deukmedjian
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-05-28

Review 10.  Operative outcomes for cervical degenerative disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kazuya Nishizawa; Kanji Mori; Yasuo Saruhashi; Yoshitaka Matsusue
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2012-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.