Literature DB >> 14589200

Gender-related differences in treatment outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Donald D McGeary1, Tom G Mayer, Robert J Gatchel, Christopher Anagnostis, Timothy J Proctor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Clinicians have long hypothesized that gender may be a risk factor in treatment outcomes of patients with chronic disability associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Although the scientific literature shows a higher prevalence of occupational low back injury in men, and a higher rate of repetitive motion and neck injuries in women, few studies have comprehensively investigated the role of gender regarding cost-related outcome variables of significance after work-related injuries.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the relationship between gender and biopsychosocial treatment outcomes in a predominately chronically disabled spinal disorder (CDSD) workers' compensation cohort undergoing a tertiary functional restoration program. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effect of gender on biopsychosocial treatment outcomes as risk factors for rehabilitation failure. PATIENT SAMPLE: A cohort of 1,827 consecutively treated patients with CDSD were placed into two gender-based groups: men (n=1,158, average age 40.7+/-10 years) and women (n=669, average age 42.5+/-10 years). OUTCOME MEASURES: Before the start of the program, and again upon completion of the program, all patients received a standard psychosocial assessment and were assessed on a variety of physical factors (leading to a cumulative score, calculated on the basis of the aggregates and averages of these physical measures). A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted at 1 year after program completion, and at least partial information was obtained from this interview on all patients in the present study.
METHODS: All patients underwent a medically directed functional restoration program combining quantitatively guided exercise progression with a multimodal disability management approach using psychological and case management techniques.
RESULTS: Men had a significantly higher rate of lumbar injury than women, whereas women had a significantly higher rate of cervical injury. Men returned to work and retained work at a 40 hours/week job at a higher rate at 1-year follow-up. Women evidenced a higher rate of health care-seeking behaviors from new providers. On physical testing immediately after treatment, men had a significantly higher cumulative physical score (gender normalized), both before and after treatment. On depression and disability questionnaires, men showed fewer pre- and posttreatment depressive symptoms with lower pretreatment disability scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the first large-scale examination of the relationship between gender and treatment outcomes for a population with CDSD after work injuries. There was a pattern of moderately better 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcome for men. On psychosocial measures, men showed lower disability and depression scores than women, with higher levels of physical functioning both before and after treatment. Overall, male patients with CDSD appeared to show somewhat better biopsychosocial outcomes. This leaves the question of identifying gender-specific risk factors to explain these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14589200     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00599-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  14 in total

1.  Long-term effects of a cognitive-behavioral training program for the management of depressive symptoms among patients in orthopedic inpatient rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lisa Tlach; Petra Hampel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Incorporating injured employee outcomes into physical and occupational therapists' practice: a controlled trial of the Worker-Based Outcomes Assessment System.

Authors:  Robert H Ross; Peter W Callas; Jesse Q Sargent; Benjamin C Amick; Ted Rooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

3.  A prospective study of the effectiveness of early intervention with high-risk back-injured workers--a pilot study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche; M L Lewis
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-11

4.  Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed functional restoration for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Brian R Theodore; Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

5.  Are gender, marital status or parenthood risk factors for outcome of treatment for chronic disabling spinal disorders?

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer; Cindy L Kidner; Donald D McGeary
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

6.  Gender differences in psychosocial influence and rehabilitation outcomes for work-disabled individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Monica Lillefjell
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

7.  A 13-year cohort study of musculoskeletal disorders treated in an autoplant, on-site physiotherapy clinic.

Authors:  Jackie Sadi; Joy C MacDermid; Bert Chesworth; Trevor Birmingham
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-23

8.  Differences in the quality of interpersonal care in complementary and conventional medicine.

Authors:  André Busato; Beat Künzi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Evaluation of a multi-disciplinary back pain rehabilitation programme--individual and group perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew Baird; Lisa Worral; Cheryl Haslam; Roger Haslam
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  A descriptive report of management strategies used by chiropractors, as reviewed by a single independent chiropractic consultant in the Australian workers compensation system.

Authors:  Henry Pollard; Katie de Luca
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.