Literature DB >> 14588393

Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone.

J S Thalgott1, J M Giuffre, K Fritts, M Timlin, Z Klezl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Autogenous posterolateral fusion with and without instrumentation has been reported with good results. However, difficult-to-fuse patients, such as smokers, elderly patients with poor bone quality and/or quantity, or patients with prior posterior surgeries, may have somewhat lower fusion rates.
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix as a bone graft extender in a human clinical model with long-term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A retrospective series of 40 patients undergoing instrumented autogenous posterolateral lumbar fusion augmented with coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix. PATIENT SAMPLE: Long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up were examined for 40 patients who underwent an instrumented posterolateral fusion only. Patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures were not considered part of the sample.
METHODS: All patients underwent successful transpedicular fixation with autogenous posterolateral lumbar fusion. Fifteen cc of Pro Osteon 500 coralline hydroxyapatite (Interpore Cross International, Irvine, CA) was used at each level. An additional 10 cc of Grafton demineralized bone matrix gel (Osteotech, Eatontown, NJ) was used in 70% of these patients.
RESULTS: An overall fusion rate of 92.5% was achieved. Pain and function improvement were good but somewhat age dependent and correlated with the number of comorbidities. Patients with Grafton DBM gel had a lower fusion rate of 89.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this small retrospective review, coralline hydroxyapatite is an effective bone graft extender in difficult-to-fuse patients as an adjunct to autologous bone for posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine when combined with rigid instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14588393     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00011-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Evaluation of bone matrix and demineralized bone matrix incorporated PLGA matrices for bone repair.

Authors:  A Champa Jayasuriya; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

4.  Fusion rate according to mixture ratio and volumes of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Yoo; Sang-Hyuk Min; Sung-Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-13

5.  The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite bone chip as an extender of local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hyoungmin Kim; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-Sup Yeom; Jae-Hyup Lee; Ki-Ho Lee; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Georgios Koureas; Spyridon Zacharatos; Zisis Papazisis; Elias Lambiris
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: an average five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yoshito Katayama; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Hisatake Yoshihara; Yoshihito Sakai; Hiroshi Nakamura; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Norimitsu Wakao; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Hisashi Iwata; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Sotirios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

9.  Instrumented fusion of thoracolumbar fracture with type I mineralized collagen matrix combined with autogenous bone marrow as a bone graft substitute: a four-case report.

Authors:  Antonio A Faundez; Sofia Taylor; André J Kaelin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches.

Authors:  Chad D Cole; Todd D McCall; Meic H Schmidt; Andrew T Dailey
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.