Literature DB >> 14587603

Physiological vulnerability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the amphibian ear.

Pim van Dijk1, Peter M Narins, Matthew J Mason.   

Abstract

The physiological vulnerability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) was investigated in the leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens. For each frog, DPOAEs were recorded from the amphibian and the basilar papillae. Measurements were taken before and after either the arrest of oxygen supply due to cardioectomy, or the destruction of the central nervous system (CNS). DPOAEs in response to high-level stimuli (> 75 dB SPL) were rather robust to these insults during the first two hours post surgery. In contrast, DPOAE amplitudes in response to low-level stimuli (< 75 dB SPL) decreased significantly. On average, low-level emissions from the amphibian papilla disappeared within 6 min for cardioectomy, and after 13 min for CNS destruction. In the basilar papilla, low-level DPOAEs disappeared more slowly: on average after 34 min following cardioectomy, and after 58 min for CNS destruction. The difference in physiological vulnerability between low- and high-level emissions is similar to that in mammals and a lizard. The difference between the DPOAE decay rate of the frog's amphibian and basilar papillae suggests important differences between the hearing mechanisms of the papillae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14587603     DOI: 10.1121/1.1608957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

2.  Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-25

3.  Beyond the limits: identifying the high-frequency detectors in the anuran ear.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; T Ulmar Grafe; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Recovery of otoacoustic emissions after high-level noise exposure in the American bullfrog.

Authors:  Dwayne D Simmons; Rachel Lohr; Helena Wotring; Miriam D Burton; Rebecca A Hooper; Richard A Baird
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Aroclor 1254 impairs the hearing ability of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Bharti Katbamna; Anna Jelaso Langerveld; Charles F Ide
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Tuning of the tectorial membrane in the basilar papilla of the northern leopard frog.

Authors:  R L M Schoffelen; J M Segenhout; P van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-02

10.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.