Literature DB >> 1458619

Nasal airflow receptors: the relative importance of temperature and tactile stimulation.

R W Clarke1, A S Jones.   

Abstract

The receptors responsible for the nasal sensation of airflow have not been identified with certainty. Although both mechanoreceptors and thermoreceptors have been implicated, evidence suggests that the nose is more sensitive to cold air than to air at body temperature. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between the velocity and the temperature of an airjet as regards its ability to stimulate the nasal lining. Both the nasal vestibule and the nasal cavum are more sensitive to cold air than to air at mean intranasal temperature (P < 0.001). A similar effect is seen with warm air which is as stimulating as cold air. The nasal vestibule is twice as sensitive as the nasal cavum to an airjet at mean intranasal temperature (P < 0.001). It is concluded that the nasal vestible is very sensitive to the tactile stimulation of an airjet. This effect is highly temperature dependent being much more pronounced for air temperatures above or below the mean intranasal temperature. The temperature effect is relatively more important in the nasal cavum which is very much less sensitive to stimulation than the vestibule.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1458619     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  6 in total

1.  In reference to Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Julia S Kimbell; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Correlation between Subjective Nasal Patency and Intranasal Airflow Distribution.

Authors:  Kevin P Casey; Azadeh A T Borojeni; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee; Guilherme J M Garcia
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Perception of better nasal patency correlates with increased mucosal cooling after surgery for nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Corbin D Sullivan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis of aggressive turbinate reductions: is it a culprit of empty nose syndrome?

Authors:  Jennifer Malik; Chengyu Li; Guillermo Maza; Alexander A Farag; Jillian P Krebs; Sam McGhee; Gabriela Zappitelli; Bhakthi Deshpande; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Kara Blacker; Brian Lyman; Pamela Dalton; Beverly J Cowart; Edmund A Pribitkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Kara Blacker; Yuehao Luo; Bruce Bryant; Jianbo Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.