Literature DB >> 14583841

Discrimination of patients with and without vertebral fractures as measured by ultrasound and DXA osteodensitometry.

J Schneider1, B Bundschuh, C Späth, C Landkammer, H Müller, U Sommer, M Götz, P Nawroth, P Heilmann, C Kasperk.   

Abstract

This study compares dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the hip and spine with quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters measured simultaneously at the calcaneal and phalangeal bone in 174 patients with and without vertebral fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of DXA and QUS measurements to discriminate patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to evaluate whether QUS measurements in addition to the DXA measurements improve the clinical discrimination between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. T-scores determined by DXA measurements at the spine and hip and QUS measurements at the calcaneus provide similar information regarding the discrimination of women with and without vertebral fractures. Phalangeal QUS measurements did not discriminate between patients with and without vertebral fractures. The discriminative power of the combined use of DXA and calcaneal QUS measurements to discern between patients with and without vertebral fractures increases in women. In contrast, the combined use of DXA and phalangeal QUS measurements resulted in decreased discriminative power as compared to DXA measurements alone. The number of fractures was higher in the quartiles with lower T-scores of the DXA and calcaneal QUS measurements whereas no difference was seen in the T-score quartiles of the phalangeal QUS device. These findings suggest that DXA and QUS measurements at weight-bearing skeletal sites provide useful information for assessing women with an anamnestic risk of osteoporotic bone loss. For DXA and calcaneal QUS measurements in men as well as for phalangeal QUS, however, a clinical algorithm remains to be established to understand the diagnostic implications and related therapeutic consequences of the obtained measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14583841     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-002-2137-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Heel bone mass of a young South Indian population with a Nigerian population residing in a South Indian suburban neighborhood: a comparative study.

Authors:  V Sapthagirivasan; M Anburajan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement.

Authors:  C Pongchaiyakul; S Panichkul; T Songpatanasilp; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study.

Authors:  Y Abe; N Takamura; Z Ye; M Tomita; M Osaki; Y Kusano; T Nakamura; K Aoyagi; S Honda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Quantitative ultrasound is better correlated with bone mineral density and biochemical bone markers in elderly women.

Authors:  Vasiliki Lappa; Ismene A Dontas; George Trovas; Evangelia Constantelou; Antonios Galanos; George P Lyritis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  The correlation between phalangeal quantitative ultrasonography and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in women with premature ovarian failure.

Authors:  Tandip S Mann; Alison H McGregor; Rajesh Patel
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2008-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.