Literature DB >> 14582528

Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury.

Sanjeev Agarwal1, Ronald J Triolo, Rudi Kobetic, Michael Miller, Carol Bieri, Sahana Kukke, Lori Rohde, John A Davis.   

Abstract

This study was completed to understand the usage patterns, system performance, degree of satisfaction, complications, and health benefits as perceived by recipients of a surgically implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers in individuals with low-cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI). A standardized telephone survey was administered to 11 recipients of the Case Western Reserve University/Veterans Affairs (CWRU/VA) implanted standing neuroprosthesis with more than 12 months of experience with the functional electrical stimulation (FES) system. Nine implant recipients were using the neuroprosthesis regularly for standing and/or exercising at the time of the survey. All 11 implant recipients noted improved health and a reduced incidence of pressure sores, leg spasms, and urinary tract infections (UTIs). No incidents of deep-vein thrombosis, infection, cellulitis, or electrical burns because of the neuroprosthesis were noted. System recipients uniformly felt that the neuroprosthesis resulted in better overall health and general well-being. Subjects were moderately to very satisfied with the performance of the neuroprosthesis and unanimously expressed a willingness to repeat the surgery and rehabilitation to obtain the same clinical outcome. All implant recipients reported the system to be safe, reliable, and easy to use. The implanted standing neuroprosthesis appears to be a clinically acceptable and effective means of providing the ability to exercise, stand, and transfer to selected individuals with paraplegia or low tetraplegia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14582528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  19 in total

1.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Implantable neurotechnologies: electrical stimulation and applications.

Authors:  Sudip Nag; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induced forelimb movement in a rodent model.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kanchiku; James V Lynskey; Danielle Protas; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Long-term follow-up of spinal cord stimulation to restore cough in subjects with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski; Dana R Hromyak; Robert T Geertman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Restoring standing capabilities with feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

7.  Understanding stand-to-sit maneuver: implications for motor system neuroprostheses after paralysis.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Rudi Kobetic; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

8.  On the identification of sensory information from mixed nerves by using single-channel cuff electrodes.

Authors:  Stanisa Raspopovic; Jacopo Carpaneto; Esther Udina; Xavier Navarro; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Selective activation of the human tibial and common peroneal nerves with a flat interface nerve electrode.

Authors:  M A Schiefer; M Freeberg; G J C Pinault; J Anderson; H Hoyen; D J Tyler; R J Triolo
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.