Literature DB >> 14582100

Prospective determination of medical necessity for ambulance transport by paramedics.

Matthew C Gratton1, Stefanie R Ellison, Jason Hunt, O John Ma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been estimated that between 11% and 61% of ambulance transports to emergency departments are not medically necessary. This study's objective was to analyze paramedic ability to determine the medical necessity of ambulance transport to the emergency department.
METHODS: Paramedics prospectively assessed adult patients transported to an emergency department during a six-week period. The setting was an urban, all advanced life support, public utility model emergency medical services (EMS) system with 58,000 transports per year. Paramedics determined medical necessity of patient transport based on the following five criteria: 1) need for out-of-hospital intervention; 2) need for expedient transport; 3) potential for self-harm; 4) severe pain; or 5) other. On arrival in the emergency department, the emergency physician made a blinded determination based on the same criteria. Kappa statistics were used to assess agreement.
RESULTS: Data forms were completed on 825 of 1,420 (58%) patients transported. Emergency physicians determined 248 (30%) transports were not necessary, paramedics 236 (29%), with agreement in 76.2% (K=0.42) of cases. Paramedics undertriaged 92 patients (11%). Rates of agreement on the five criteria were: 1) 71.9% (K=0.43); 2) 77.7% (K=0.22); 3) 89.6% (K=0.40); 4) 89.6 (K=0.32); and 5) 82.2% (K=0.29).
CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics and emergency physicians agreed that a significant percentage of patients did not require ambulance transport to the emergency department. Despite only moderate agreement regarding which patients needed transport, the undertriage rate was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14582100     DOI: 10.1080/31270300220x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  15 in total

Review 1.  Introduction of non-transport guidelines into an ambulance service: a retrospective review.

Authors:  J T Gray; J Wardrope
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Medically unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transports among children ages 0 to 17 years.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Elizabeth G Baxley; Janice C Probst; James R Hussey; Charity G Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-07-01

3.  A comparative assessment of adverse event classification in the out-of-hospital setting.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Judith R Lave; Matthew D Weaver; Francis X Guyette; Robert M Arnold; Christian Martin-Gill; Jon C Rittenberger; David Krackhardt; Vincent N Mosesso; Ronald N Roth; Richard J Wadas; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Changes in the proportion and severity of patients with fever or common cold symptoms utilizing an after-hours house call medical service during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tokyo, Japan: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ryota Inokuchi; Kojiro Morita; Masao Iwagami; Taeko Watanabe; Masatoshi Ishikawa; Nanako Tamiya
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 5.  A patient-safety and professional perspective on non-conveyance in ambulance care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Lilian C M Vloet; Renate F Speijers; Nico W Tönjes; Jorik Loef; Thomas Pelgrim; Margreet Hoogeveen; Sivera A A Berben
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Appropriateness of cases presenting in the emergency department following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn Eastwood; Karen Smith; Amee Morgans; Johannes Stoelwinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Examination of EMS Decision Making in Determining Suitability of Patient Diversion to Urgent Care Centers.

Authors:  Gerard Carroll; Katelyn Levy; Richard Pescatore; Rick Hong
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-02

8.  Assessing non-conveyed patients in the ambulance service: a phenomenological interview study with Swedish ambulance clinicians.

Authors:  Jakob Lederman; Caroline Löfvenmark; Therese Djärv; Veronica Lindström; Carina Elmqvist
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Areas of Potential Impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on EMS: A Synthesis of the Literature.

Authors:  Daniel G Ostermayer; Charles A Brown; William G Fernandez; Emily Couvillon
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-13

10.  Stakeholder opinion on the proposal to introduce 'treat and referral' into the Irish emergency medical service.

Authors:  Brian Power; Gerard Bury; John Ryan
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.