Literature DB >> 14581427

Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing.

Marc D Schwartz1, Elizabeth Kaufman, Beth N Peshkin, Claudine Isaacs, Chanita Hughes, Tiffani DeMarco, Clinton Finch, Caryn Lerman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the widespread availability of genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, little is known about the impact of testing on ovarian cancer prevention and screening. For mutation testing to effect cancer mortality, positive test results must be followed by appropriate behavior change. In this study, we prospectively examined the impact of BRCA1/2 testing on the utilization of prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Participants were 289 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. We measured self-reported receipt of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy (BPO) and utilization of CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) in the year following testing, and examined the impact of test results on these outcomes. In addition, we examined the role of sociodemographic, medical, family history, and psychological variables on the receipt of BPO, CA-125, and TVU.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of mutation carriers, 5% of uninformative patients, and 2% of noncarriers received a BPO in the year following testing. In addition to test results, perceived risk for ovarian cancer and family history of ovarian cancer independently predicted receipt of BPO. The receipt of a positive test result was associated with increased utilization of CA-125 and TVU. Additional predictors included perceived risk for ovarian cancer (both CA-125 and TVU) and state anxiety (CA-125).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the significant behavioral impact of receiving a positive BRCA1/2 test result. The increased rate of oophorectomy among mutation carriers suggests that testing for BRCA1/2 mutations may ultimately impact ovarian cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14581427     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Long-term reactions to genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: does time heal women's concerns?

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Jill E Stopfer; Jasmine McDonald; Benita Weathers; Aliya Collier; Andrea B Troxel; Susan Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Acceptance of preventive surgeries by Israeli women who had undergone BRCA testing.

Authors:  Vardit Kram; Tamar Peretz; Michal Sagi
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J R J De Leeuw; M J van Vliet; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Uptake, time course, and predictors of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA carriers.

Authors:  Mary S Beattie; Beth Crawford; Feng Lin; Eric Vittinghoff; John Ziegler
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-02

Review 6.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

7.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Variation in rates of uptake of preventive options by Canadian women carrying the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutation.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Parviz Ghadirian; Barry Rosen; William Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Andrea Eisen; Peter Ainsworth; Doug Horsman; Christine Maugard; Diane Provencher; André Robideaux; Dawna Gilchrist; Albert Chudley; Edmond G Lemire; Susan Armel; Amy Finch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.