PURPOSE: To determine clinical and immunologic responses to a multipeptide melanoma vaccine regimen, a randomized phase II trial was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced melanoma were randomly assigned to vaccination with a mixture of four gp100 and tyrosinase peptides restricted by HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-A3, plus a tetanus helper peptide, either in an emulsion with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic Inc, Fairfield, NJ), or pulsed on monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). Systemic low-dose interleukin-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was given to both groups. T-lymphocyte responses were assessed, by interferon gamma ELIspot assay (Chiron, Emeryville, CA), in peripheral-blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and in a lymph node draining a vaccine site (sentinel immunized node [SIN]). RESULTS: In patients vaccinated with GM-CSF in adjuvant, T-cell responses to melanoma peptides were observed in 42% of PBLs and 80% of SINs, but in patients vaccinated with DCs, they were observed in only 11% and 13%, respectively. The overall immune response was greater in the GM-CSF arm (P <.02). Vitiligo developed in two of 13 patients in the GM-CSF arm but in no patients in the DC arm. Helper T-cell responses to the tetanus peptide were detected in PBLs after vaccination and correlated with T-cell reactivity to the melanoma peptides. Objective clinical responses were observed in two patients in the GM-CSF arm and one patient in the DC arm. Stable disease was observed in two patients in the GM-CSF arm and one patient in the DC arm. CONCLUSION: The high frequency of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses and the occurrence of clinical tumor regressions support continued investigation of multipeptide vaccines administered with GM-CSF in adjuvant.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine clinical and immunologic responses to a multipeptide melanoma vaccine regimen, a randomized phase II trial was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced melanoma were randomly assigned to vaccination with a mixture of four gp100 and tyrosinase peptides restricted by HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-A3, plus a tetanus helper peptide, either in an emulsion with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant (Seppic Inc, Fairfield, NJ), or pulsed on monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). Systemic low-dose interleukin-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) was given to both groups. T-lymphocyte responses were assessed, by interferon gamma ELIspot assay (Chiron, Emeryville, CA), in peripheral-blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and in a lymph node draining a vaccine site (sentinel immunized node [SIN]). RESULTS: In patients vaccinated with GM-CSF in adjuvant, T-cell responses to melanoma peptides were observed in 42% of PBLs and 80% of SINs, but in patients vaccinated with DCs, they were observed in only 11% and 13%, respectively. The overall immune response was greater in the GM-CSF arm (P <.02). Vitiligo developed in two of 13 patients in the GM-CSF arm but in no patients in the DC arm. Helper T-cell responses to the tetanus peptide were detected in PBLs after vaccination and correlated with T-cell reactivity to the melanoma peptides. Objective clinical responses were observed in two patients in the GM-CSF arm and one patient in the DC arm. Stable disease was observed in two patients in the GM-CSF arm and one patient in the DC arm. CONCLUSION: The high frequency of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses and the occurrence of clinical tumor regressions support continued investigation of multipeptide vaccines administered with GM-CSF in adjuvant.
Authors: Willem W Overwijk; Karin E de Visser; Felicia H Tirion; Laurina A de Jong; Thijs W H Pols; Yme U van der Velden; Jasper G van den Boorn; Anna M Keller; Wim A Buurman; Marc R Theoret; Bianca Blom; Nicholas P Restifo; Ada M Kruisbeek; Robert A Kastelein; John B A G Haanen Journal: J Immunol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Sarah E Church; Shawn M Jensen; Christopher G Twitty; Keith Bahjat; Hong-Ming Hu; Walter J Urba; Bernard A Fox Journal: Cancer J Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.360
Authors: Patrick J Schuler; Malgorzata Harasymczuk; Carmen Visus; Albert Deleo; Sumita Trivedi; Yu Lei; Athanassios Argiris; William Gooding; Lisa H Butterfield; Theresa L Whiteside; Robert L Ferris Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sumia Ali; Gwendalyn D King; James F Curtin; Marianela Candolfi; Weidong Xiong; Chunyan Liu; Mariana Puntel; Queng Cheng; Jesus Prieto; Antoni Ribas; Jerzy Kupiec-Weglinski; Nico van Rooijen; Hans Lassmann; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Paul Spearman; Spyros Kalams; Marnie Elizaga; Barbara Metch; Ya-Lin Chiu; Mary Allen; Kent J Weinhold; Guido Ferrari; Scott D Parker; M Juliana McElrath; Sharon E Frey; Jonathan D Fuchs; Michael C Keefer; Michael D Lubeck; Michael Egan; Ralph Braun; John H Eldridge; Barton F Haynes; Lawrence Corey Journal: Vaccine Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni; Walter C Olson; Mark E Smolkin; Merrick I Ross; Naomi B Haas; William W Grosh; Marc E Boisvert; John M Kirkwood; Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 12.531