Literature DB >> 14580698

Effects of multiple delayed rewards on delay discounting in an adjusting amount procedure.

Suzanne H. Mitchell1, Abigail J. Rosenthal.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that when the delivery of several rewards is separated in time, e.g. one reward immediately and a second reward a few moments later, the value of an alternative that includes these "bundled" rewards will be the sum of the hyperbolic discount functions of the individual rewards. The current study examined this hypothesis using an adjusting amount procedure. In this procedure, rats chose between a delayed food alternative and an immediate food alternative, where the amount of immediate food altered according to each rat's choices. The size of the immediate reward when rats were indifferent between the delayed and immediate alternatives indexed the value of the delayed alternative. Discount functions describing the relationship between the indifference points and the delay to food were created for conditions in which the delay alternative consisted of a single reward (150mul of sucrose solution) delayed by 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. These functions were used to predict the indifference points in other conditions for which an additional 150mul of sucrose solution was delivered at 0, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. The model fit the data well. However, there were systematic deviations that suggested animals were sensitive to the context within which delays were presented, in addition to the delays themselves. That is, preference for the delayed alternative was lower than predicted when the delay to the additional reward was long (8 or 16s) and higher than the predicted values when it was short (0 or 4s).

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580698     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00144-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

Review 1.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Response bias is unaffected by delay length in a delay discounting paradigm.

Authors:  Clare J Wilhelm; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Effects of reward bundling on male rats' preference for larger-later food rewards.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; Rochelle R Smits; Patrick S Johnson; Kennan J Liston; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discounting of reward sequences: a test of competing formal models of hyperbolic discounting.

Authors:  Noah Zarr; William H Alexander; Joshua W Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-06

5.  Choice bundling, unpacked: Observed and predicted effects on intertemporal choice in an additive model of hyperbolic delay discounting.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.