Literature DB >> 14580616

Sudomotor nerve conduction velocity and central processing time of the skin conductance response.

C L Lim1, M Seto-Poon, P D Clouston, J G L Morris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sudomotor nerve conduction velocity (CV), the central processing time (CPT) and habituation of the skin conductance response (SCR).
METHODS: SCRs in response to a single deep inspiratory breath, an electrical stimulus and a sound click were obtained from the fingers and toes of 30 healthy adults. Sudomotor nerve conduction velocities were determined after measuring extremity length and latency differences. CPT was estimated by subtracting the efferent time and the known afferent times and neuroeffector times from the onset latency.
RESULTS: The inspiratory SCR habituated slower than the auditory or electrical SCRs. CVs of the 3 modalities did not differ statistically and their mean was 1.07 m s(-1) (95% CI: 1.01-1.13). The inspiratory SCR arrived at the fingers 1.26+/-0.09 s after the onset of chest wall movement. Electrical and auditory SCR onset latencies at the fingers were 1.60+/-0.03 and 1.75+/-0.04 s, respectively. Their CPTs were 140 and 160 ms, estimated from the electrical and auditory SCR onset latencies to the fingers. The CPT for inspiratory SCR was estimated to occur during the inspiratory CPT after the inspiratory decision and before chest movement.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the SCR following an electrical or auditory stimulus, initiation of deep inspiratory SCR occurs before the inspiratory act, precluding any possible input from respiratory afferent receptors and implicating a central generator. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new insights into the origin of the SCR following inspiration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580616     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  10 in total

1.  Brain activity during a motor learning task: an fMRI and skin conductance study.

Authors:  Bradley J Macintosh; Richard Mraz; William E McIlroy; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Challenging the brain: Exploring the link between effort and cortical activation.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; T Hoque; R Mraz; B J Macintosh; S J Graham; S E Black; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Sweating on the palm and sole: physiological and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Masato Asahina; Anupama Poudel; Shigeki Hirano
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  Physiological Correlates of Fluent and Stuttered Speech Production in Preschool Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Evan Usler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Age differences in perception and awareness of emotion.

Authors:  Michelle B Neiss; Lindsey A Leigland; Nichole E Carlson; Jeri S Janowsky
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity.

Authors:  Mathias Benedek; Christian Kaernbach
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  An Evolutionarily Threat-Relevant Odor Strengthens Human Fear Memory.

Authors:  Jessica E Taylor; Hakwan Lau; Ben Seymour; Aya Nakae; Hidenobu Sumioka; Mitsuo Kawato; Ai Koizumi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Preschoolers Who Stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith; Sharon L Christ; Christine Weber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Pain-autonomic interaction is a reliable measure of pain habituation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Iara De Schoenmacker; Chiara Leu; Armin Curt; Michèle Hubli
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.651

10.  Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution.

Authors:  Mathias Benedek; Christian Kaernbach
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.016

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.