Literature DB >> 14577458

Common morality, coherence, and the principles of biomedical ethics.

David DeGrazia1.   

Abstract

The fifth edition of Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics is distinguished by its emphatic embrace of common morality as the ultimate source of moral norms. This essay critically evaluates the fifth edition's discussion of common morality and, to a lesser extent, its treatment of coherence (both the model of ethical justification and the associated concept). It is argued that the book is overly accommodating of existing moral beliefs. The paper concludes with three suggestions for improving this leading text.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14577458     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2003.0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  12 in total

1.  Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: the points of conflict.

Authors:  Robert M Veatch
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-02

2.  Moral acquaintances: Loewy, Wildes, and beyond.

Authors:  Stephen S Hanson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-09

3.  Common morality: comment on Beauchamp and Childress.

Authors:  Oliver Rauprich
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008-04-08

4.  Human rights, cultural pluralism, and international health research.

Authors:  Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

5.  Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research: A Philosophical Review and Reconsideration.

Authors:  John Rossi; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Common sense and the common morality in theory and practice.

Authors:  Patrick Daly
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-06

7.  Common morality and moral reform.

Authors:  K A Wallace
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009

8.  Knowledge of Partial Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness: Implications for Ethical Evaluations?

Authors:  Orsolya Friedrich
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 1.480

9.  How "moral" are the principles of biomedical ethics?--a cross-domain evaluation of the common morality hypothesis.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Christian Ineichen; Carmen Tanner
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.