Literature DB >> 14576541

Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.

André A J Van Zundert1, Kristine Fonck, Baha Al-Shaikh, Eric Mortier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The laryngeal mask airway LMA-Classic has been used widely in clinical practice. A new disposable supraglottic airway device, the Soft Seal LM, has been introduced recently. In a randomized study, the authors compared the LMA-Classic and the disposable Soft Seal LM in terms of their clinical performance, cuff pressures during nitrous oxide anesthesia, position of the laryngeal mask in situ by fiberoptic evaluation, and morbidity in a wide range of routine general surgery procedures.
METHODS: A total of 200 adult patients were randomly assigned to a size 4 laryngeal mask in two equal-sized groups for airway management during surgery: (1) LMA-Classic (Intavent Orthofix Ltd., Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom); or (2) Soft Seal LM (Portex Ltd., Hythe, Kent, United Kingdom). Anesthesia was administered with fentanyl, propofol, nitrous oxide, oxygen, and sevoflurane. The variables studied were ease of insertion, fiberoptic view, time in situ, incidence of blood on the laryngeal mask at the time of removal, and the incidence of postoperative sore throat at 2 and 24 h. The laryngeal mask cuff pressures were measured continuously. Intracuff pressure limitation was not attempted.
RESULTS: The LMA-Classic and the Soft Seal LM showed similar clinical performances, as shown by their insertion time (successful insertion at first attempt was achieved within 20 s in 97% with LMA-Classic trade mark vs. 95% with Soft Seal LM), fiberoptic evaluation of the anatomic position of the laryngeal mask, and satisfactory anesthesia conditions. Laryngeal mask cuff pressures increased from 45 to 100.3 mmHg in the LMA-Classic and from 45 to 46.8 mmHg in the Soft Seal LM (P < 0.001). Macroscopic blood was seen on only four occasions in the LMA-Classic group. The incidence of sore throat was significantly increased at 2 h postoperatively when using the LMA-Classic, although there was no difference at 24 h after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In spontaneously breathing adult patients requiring a size 4 laryngeal mask airway, the new disposable Soft Seal LM device is an acceptable alternative to the reusable LMA-Classic trade mark, resulting in a good laryngeal seal and offering similar clinical performance. Cuff pressures increase substantially when the LMA-Classic is used but not when using the Soft Seal LM. There was less trauma to patients using the Soft Seal LM, as assessed by the incidence of sore throat in the early postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14576541     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

1.  The air-Q(®) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure.

Authors:  R E Galgon; K M Schroeder; S Han; A Andrei; A M Joffe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

3.  Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian; Navid Nouraei; Seyed Sadjad Razavi; Ebrahim Zaker; Alireza Jafari; Parivash Eftekhari; Golnar Radmand; Seyed Amir Mohajerani; Badiozzaman Radpay
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

4.  Assessing a novel second generation laryngeal mask airway using the 'ADEPT' approach: results from the LMA® Protector™ observational study.

Authors:  A Ní Eochagáin; V Athanassoglou; A Cumberworth; O Morris; S Corbett; H Jefferson; E P O'Sullivan; J J Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 1.977

5.  Randomized Comparison of Actual and Ideal Body Weight for Size Selection of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in Overweight Patients.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Hyo Jong Kang; Ji Eun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Extraglottic airway devices: technology update.

Authors:  Bimla Sharma; Chand Sahai; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.