Literature DB >> 14575105

Epidemiology, production losses, and control measures associated with an outbreak of avian influenza subtype H7N2 in Pennsylvania (1996-98).

D J Henzler1, D C Kradel, S Davison, A F Ziegler, D Singletary, P DeBok, A E Castro, H Lu, R Eckroade, D Swayne, W Lagoda, B Schmucker, A Nesselrodt.   

Abstract

An outbreak of H7N2 low-pathogenicity (LP) avian influenza (AI) occurred in a two-county area in Pennsylvania from December of 1996 through April of 1998. The outbreak resulted in infection of 2,623,116 commercial birds on 25 premises encompassing 47 flocks. Twenty-one (one premise with infection twice) of the twenty-five infected premises housed egg-laying chickens and one premise each had turkeys, layer pullets, quail, and a mixed backyard dealer flock. Despite dose proximity of infected flocks to commercial broiler flocks, no infected broilers were identified. Experimentally, when market age broilers were placed on an influenza-infected premise they seroconverted and developed oviduct lesions. The outbreak was believed to have originated from two separate introductions into commercial layer flocks from premises and by individuals dealing in sales of live fowl in the metropolitan New York and New Jersey live-bird markets. Source flocks for these markets are primarily in the northeast and mid-Atlantic areas, including Pennsylvania. Mixed fowl sold include ducks, geese, guinea hens, quail, chukar partridges, and a variety of chickens grown on perhaps hundreds of small farms. Infections with the H7N2 AI virus were associated with variable morbidity and temporary decreases in egg production ranging from 1.6% to 29.1% in commercial egg-laying chickens. Egg production losses averaged 4.0 weeks duration. Mortality ranged from 1.5 to 18.3 times normal (mean of 4.3 times normal). Duration of mortality ranged from 2 to 13 weeks (average of 3.9 weeks) in flocks not depopulated. Lesions observed were primarily oviducts filled with a mucous and white gelatinous exudates and atypical egg yolk peritonitis. Quarantine of premises and complete depopulation were the early measures employed in control of this outbreak. Epidemiological studies suggested that depopulation furthered the spread of influenza to nearby flocks. Thereafter, later control measures included quarantine, strict biosecurity, and controlled marketing of products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575105     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-47.s3.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ecology of avian influenza viruses in a changing world.

Authors:  Kurt J Vandegrift; Susanne H Sokolow; Peter Daszak; A Marm Kilpatrick
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Key strategies for reducing spread of avian influenza among commercial poultry holdings: lessons for transmission to humans.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Menach; Elisabeta Vergu; Rebecca F Grais; David L Smith; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Development and evaluation of an Influenza virus subtype H7N2 vaccine candidate for pandemic preparedness.

Authors:  Claudia Pappas; Yumiko Matsuoka; David E Swayne; Ruben O Donis
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-10-03

4.  Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry.

Authors:  Sema Nickbakhsh; Louise Matthews; Paul R Bessell; Stuart W J Reid; Rowland R Kao
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses in wild house mice.

Authors:  Susan A Shriner; Kaci K VanDalen; Nicole L Mooers; Jeremy W Ellis; Heather J Sullivan; J Jeffrey Root; Angela M Pelzel; Alan B Franklin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cost analysis of various low pathogenic avian influenza surveillance systems in the Dutch egg layer sector.

Authors:  Niels Rutten; José L Gonzales; Armin R W Elbers; Annet G J Velthuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Susceptibility to and transmission of H5N1 and H7N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in bank voles (Myodes glareolus).

Authors:  Aurora Romero Tejeda; Roberta Aiello; Angela Salomoni; Valeria Berton; Marta Vascellari; Giovanni Cattoli
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Age is not a determinant factor in susceptibility of broilers to H5N2 clade 2.3.4.4 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Kateri Bertran; Dong-Hun Lee; Charles Balzli; Mary J Pantin-Jackwood; Erica Spackman; David E Swayne
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Seroprevalence of low pathogenic avian influenza (H9N2) and associated risk factors in the Gyeonggi-do of Korea during 2005-2006.

Authors:  Jong-Tae Woo; Bong Kyun Park
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 10.  Prevalence and control of H7 avian influenza viruses in birds and humans.

Authors:  E M Abdelwhab; J Veits; T C Mettenleiter
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.