Literature DB >> 14574175

Cancer prone persons. A randomized screening trial based on colonoscopy: background, design and recruitment.

F Eisinger1, J P Giordanella, A Brigand, R Didelot, D Jacques, G Schenowitz, C Julian-Reynier, J F Seitz, H Sobol, J Faivre, H Allemand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based counseling and prevention are not available so far for hereditary cancer prone persons, since we lack data based on clinical trials. There are very few high-risk persons in the population as a whole. Based on a familial history analysis, only 1.2% of all healthy volunteers attending screening centers reached the arbitrary high-risk level defined as a Relative Risk of more than 4. We describe a randomized trial based on colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer on a sub-group of high-risk group persons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among the 77 members of the French Institutional Preventive Center Network, 37 took part in this protocol. During the first 3 years, 850,000 persons were interviewed at these 37 Health centers. The enrollment process was particularly time-consuming, since a large amount of information had to be delivered to the participants.
RESULTS: The mean rate of recruitment of eligible candidates was far lower than predicted, averaging only 1.4 per 1,000 persons interviewed instead of the 9/1,000 expected. This mean figure was based, however, on inclusion rates ranging from 0.06/1,000 to 7/1,000 among the different centers. The low rates of recruitment were mainly due to the inter-center heterogeneity (differences in commitment and in the resources), and to the fact that the acceptability of undergoing a colonoscopy turned out to be lower than predicted.
CONCLUSION: Population trials on cancer prone persons are feasible, but vast numbers have to be pre- screened to identify the few people with a high hereditary risk and willing to accept screening within a controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14574175     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021177417531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  21 in total

1.  [Strategy of screening for patients at high risk of colorectal neoplasm].

Authors:  S Olschwang; P Laurent-Puig
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1998-03

2.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; P D Murphy; M S Watson; P A Barr
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Perceived benefits of and barriers to participation in a phase I/II colon cancer chemoprevention trial.

Authors:  K S Hudmon; R R Love; R M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; G Petersen; P Lynch; J Botkin; M Daly; J Garber; M J Kahn; A McTiernan; K Offit; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Should women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer be randomized to prophylactic surgery? An ethical and empirical assessment.

Authors:  E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; G Geller; K J Helzlsouer; T Doksum; N A Holtzman
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000-04

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C S Fuchs; E L Giovannucci; G A Colditz; D J Hunter; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  J H Bond
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recruitment to multicentre trials--lessons from UKCTOCS: descriptive study.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Aarti Sharma; Matthew Burnell; Rachel Hallett; Sara Lewis; Alberto Lopez; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Ali McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Steve Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-13

2.  Acceptability of cancer chemoprevention trials: impact of the design.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Maisonneuve; Laetitia Huiart; Laetitia Rabayrol; Doug Horsman; Remi Didelot; Hagay Sobol; Francois Eisinger
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  A randomised comparison of UK genetic risk counselling services for familial cancer: psychosocial outcomes.

Authors:  P Hopwood; D Wonderling; M Watson; A Cull; F Douglas; T Cole; D Eccles; J Gray; V Murday; M Steel; J Burn; K McPherson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.