Literature DB >> 14574173

MRI screening for breast cancer in women with familial or genetic predisposition: design of the Dutch National Study (MRISC).

M Kriege1, C T Brekelmans, C Boetes, E J Rutgers, J C Oosterwijk, R A Tollenaar, R A Manoliu, R Holland, H J de Koning, J G Klijn.   

Abstract

Mammography screening of women aged 50-70 years for breast cancer has proven to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality. There is no consensus about the value of breast cancer screening in women aged 40-49 years. Five to ten per cent of all breast cancers are hereditary. One of the options to reduce the risk of breast cancer mortality for women with a familial or genetic predisposition is intensive surveillance. However, the effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in these women, who are mainly younger than 50 years, is unproven. MRI might increase the effectiveness of screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. This paper describes the design of the Dutch national study for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. The aims of this study are to investigate: the value of regular surveillance in women with a familial or genetic predisposition for breast cancer, the efficacy of MRI as compared to mammography, cost-effectiveness of regular screening and quality of life during surveillance. Included are women with a lifetime risk of familial breast cancer of 15% or more or BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, who visit one of the Dutch family cancer clinics. The aim is to include 2,500 women. The study started on 1 November 1999. On 1 January 2002, more than 1,700 women, including 210 proven carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, were included in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14574173     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021135809870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  31 in total

1.  Screening women with a family history of breast cancer--results from the British Familial Breast Cancer Group.

Authors:  R D Macmillan
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  O Olsen; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  H Meijers-Heijboer; B van Geel; W L van Putten; S C Henzen-Logmans; C Seynaeve; M B Menke-Pluymers; C C Bartels; L C Verhoog; A M van den Ouweland; M F Niermeijer; C T Brekelmans; J G Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S E Harms
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Inherited breast carcinoma--prospective findings in 1,194 women at risk.

Authors:  P Møller; L Maehle; K Heimdal; A Dørum; S Tretli; P Helgerud; H Quist; H Bjørndal; R Kåresen; A Nysted; J E Varhaug; H E Fjøsne; R J Guleng; J Due; P Bøhler; K E Giercksky; C Tropé; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  7 in total

1.  Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; E van As; J Cockburn; H J de Koning
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Early uptake of breast magnetic resonance imaging in a community-based medical practice, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Comment on screening by MRI mentioned in the reviews by narod and møller.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile Tm Brekelmans; Jan Gm Klijn
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Comparison of false positive rates for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high risk women performed on stacked versus alternating schedules.

Authors:  Edress Othman; Jue Wang; Brian L Sprague; Tiffany Rounds; YongLi Ji; Sally D Herschorn; Marie E Wood
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-02-13

6.  Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; S van Dooren; G J J M Borsboom; C Seynaeve; C C M Bartels; J G M Klijn; A Tibben; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Practical consensus recommendations regarding the management of sentinel lymph node issues in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Vedant Kabra; R Aggarwal; S Vardhan; M Singh; R Khandelwal; S Jain; S Sahani; S Saini; N Deo; R Kaul; P M Parikh; S Aggarwal
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.