Literature DB >> 14573831

Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme.

J Darroch1, L Myers, J Cassell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore men's and women's accounts of chlamydia testing, with a view to understanding sex differences in attitudes and in behaviours of public health importance.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 24 heterosexual patients (12 men; 12 women) diagnosed with genital chlamydia infection, at a large sexual health clinic in central London were transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants' expressions revealed important sex differences. Women felt anxious about their future reproductive health, feared stigmatisation, and blamed themselves for contracting chlamydia; whereas men generally reported less concern, were unwilling to disclose their condition to sexual partners, and some men projected attributions of blame onto their partners. Delays in seeking care appeared to be related to perceptions of chlamydia as a relatively minor infection, particularly in men.
CONCLUSIONS: Health promotion needs to reflect sex and age differences, emphasising the negative consequences of delayed clinic attendance and exposure to repeat infections. For health professionals to respond appropriately and effectively to increasing numbers of chlamydia infections, there is a need to understand men's avoidant attitudes and behaviours in relation to sexual and reproductive health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14573831      PMCID: PMC1744751          DOI: 10.1136/sti.79.5.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  13 in total

1.  "It feels good to be told that I'm all clear": patients' accounts of retesting following genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  H Piercy
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Screening for nonviral sexually transmitted infections in adolescents and young adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Gender differences in sexual behaviours in response to genitourinary symptoms.

Authors:  A Khan; J D Fortenberry; M' H Temkit; W Tu; D P Orr; B E Batteiger
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Barriers to and facilitators of partner notification for chlamydia trachomatis among health care professionals.

Authors:  Kevin A T M Theunissen; Pim Schipper; Christian J P A Hoebe; Rik Crutzen; Gerjo Kok; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  "It's just an issue and you deal with it… you just deal with it, you move on and you do it together.": Men's experiences of bacterial vaginosis and the acceptability of male partner treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Wigan; Cathy Vaughn; Lenka Vodstrcil; Michelle Doyle; Marti Kaiser; Collette McGuiness; Catriona S Bradshaw; Jade E Bilardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  STI service delivery in British Columbia, Canada; providers' views of their services to youth.

Authors:  Cindy L Masaro; Joy Johnson; Cathy Chabot; Jean Shoveller
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane M Gunn; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Non-participation in chlamydia screening in The Netherlands: determinants associated with young people's intention to participate in chlamydia screening.

Authors:  Gill A ten Hoor; Robert A C Ruiter; Jan E A M van Bergen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Katrijn Houben; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.