Literature DB >> 10936916

Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study.

G Dehaene-Lambertz1, E Dupoux, A Gout.   

Abstract

It is well known that speech perception is deeply affected by the phoneme categories of the native language. Recent studies have found that phonotactics, i.e., constraints on the cooccurrence of phonemes within words, also have a considerable impact on speech perception routines. For example, Japanese does not allow (nonnasal) coda consonants. When presented with stimuli that violate this constraint, as in / ebzo/, Japanese adults report that they hear a /u/ between consonants, i.e., /ebuzo/. We examine this phenomenon using event-related potentials (ERPs) on French and Japanese participants in order to study how and when the phonotactic properties of the native language affect speech perception routines. Trials using four similar precursor stimuli were presented followed by a test stimulus that was either identical or different depending on the presence or absence of an epenthetic vowel /u/ between two consonants (e.g., "ebuzo ebuzo ebuzo- ebzo"). Behavioral results confirm that Japanese, unlike French participants, are not able to discriminate between identical and deviant trials. In ERPs, three mismatch responses were recorded in French participants. These responses were either absent or significantly weaker for Japanese. In particular, a component similar in latency and topography to the mismatch negativity (MMN) was recorded for French, but not for Japanese participants. Our results suggest that the impact of phonotactics takes place early in speech processing and support models of speech perception, which postulate that the input signal is directly parsed into the native language phonological format. We speculate that such a fast computation of a phonological representation should facilitate lexical access, especially in degraded conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10936916     DOI: 10.1162/089892900562390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  33 in total

1.  To what extent do we hear phonemic contrasts in a non-native regional variety? Tracking the dynamics of perceptual processing with EEG.

Authors:  Sophie Dufour; Angèle Brunellière; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

2.  Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sumacku or Smack? The value of analyzing acoustic signals when investigating the fundamental phonological unit of language production.

Authors:  Rinus G Verdonschot; Hinako Masuda
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-03

5.  The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: a behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  The neural correlates of speech motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Jennifer A Segawa; Jason A Tourville; Deryk S Beal; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Magnetoencephalography shows atypical sensitivity to linguistic sound sequences in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; Neelima Wagley; Ioulia Kovelman; Susan M Bowyer; Annette E Richard; Renee Lajiness-O'Neill
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Ryan C N D'Arcy; John F Connolly; Elisabet Service; Colin S Hawco; Michael E Houlihan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection.

Authors:  Aaron J Newman; Michael T Ullman; Roumyana Pancheva; Diane L Waligura; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Recognizing sequences of sequences.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Katharina von Kriegstein; Jean Daunizeau; Karl J Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.