Literature DB >> 14573496

Large-scale adaptive hitchhiking upon high recombination in Drosophila simulans.

Humberto Quesada1, Ursula E M Ramírez, Julio Rozas, Montserrat Aguadé.   

Abstract

Natural selection is expected to leave a characteristic footprint on neighboring nucleotide variation through the effects of genetic linkage. The size of the region affected is proportional to the strength of selection and greatly reduced with the recombinational distance from the selected site. Thus, the genomic footprint of selection is generally believed to be restricted to a small DNA stretch in normal and highly recombining regions. Here, we study the effect of selection on linked polymorphism (hitchhiking effect) by surveying nucleotide variation across a highly recombining approximately 88-kb genomic fragment in an African population of Drosophila simulans. We find a core region of up to 38 kb with a major haplotype at intermediate frequency. The extended haplotype structure that gradually vanishes until disappearing is unusual for a highly recombining region. Both the presence in the structured genomic domain of a single major haplotype depleted of variability and the detected spatial pattern of variation along the approximately 88-kb fragment are incompatible with neutral predictions in a panmictic population. A major role of demographic effects could also be discarded. The observed pattern of variation clearly provides evidence that directional selection has acted recently on this region, sweeping out variation around a strongly adaptive mutation. Our findings suggest a major role of positive selection in shaping DNA variability even in highly recombining regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14573496      PMCID: PMC1462778     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Unusual haplotype structure at the proximal breakpoint of In(2L)t in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; J D Wall; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Nurminsky; D D Aguiar; C D Bustamante; D L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model.

Authors:  F Depaulis; M Veuille
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T J Gibson; F Plewniak; F Jeanmougin; D G Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D A Kirby; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R R Hudson; K Bailey; D Skarecky; J Kwiatowski; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Deleterious background selection with recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Adams; S E Celniker; R A Holt; C A Evans; J D Gocayne; P G Amanatides; S E Scherer; P W Li; R A Hoskins; R F Galle; R A George; S E Lewis; S Richards; M Ashburner; S N Henderson; G G Sutton; J R Wortman; M D Yandell; Q Zhang; L X Chen; R C Brandon; Y H Rogers; R G Blazej; M Champe; B D Pfeiffer; K H Wan; C Doyle; E G Baxter; G Helt; C R Nelson; G L Gabor; J F Abril; A Agbayani; H J An; C Andrews-Pfannkoch; D Baldwin; R M Ballew; A Basu; J Baxendale; L Bayraktaroglu; E M Beasley; K Y Beeson; P V Benos; B P Berman; D Bhandari; S Bolshakov; D Borkova; M R Botchan; J Bouck; P Brokstein; P Brottier; K C Burtis; D A Busam; H Butler; E Cadieu; A Center; I Chandra; J M Cherry; S Cawley; C Dahlke; L B Davenport; P Davies; B de Pablos; A Delcher; Z Deng; A D Mays; I Dew; S M Dietz; K Dodson; L E Doup; M Downes; S Dugan-Rocha; B C Dunkov; P Dunn; K J Durbin; C C Evangelista; C Ferraz; S Ferriera; W Fleischmann; C Fosler; A E Gabrielian; N S Garg; W M Gelbart; K Glasser; A Glodek; F Gong; J H Gorrell; Z Gu; P Guan; M Harris; N L Harris; D Harvey; T J Heiman; J R Hernandez; J Houck; D Hostin; K A Houston; T J Howland; M H Wei; C Ibegwam; M Jalali; F Kalush; G H Karpen; Z Ke; J A Kennison; K A Ketchum; B E Kimmel; C D Kodira; C Kraft; S Kravitz; D Kulp; Z Lai; P Lasko; Y Lei; A A Levitsky; J Li; Z Li; Y Liang; X Lin; X Liu; B Mattei; T C McIntosh; M P McLeod; D McPherson; G Merkulov; N V Milshina; C Mobarry; J Morris; A Moshrefi; S M Mount; M Moy; B Murphy; L Murphy; D M Muzny; D L Nelson; D R Nelson; K A Nelson; K Nixon; D R Nusskern; J M Pacleb; M Palazzolo; G S Pittman; S Pan; J Pollard; V Puri; M G Reese; K Reinert; K Remington; R D Saunders; F Scheeler; H Shen; B C Shue; I Sidén-Kiamos; M Simpson; M P Skupski; T Smith; E Spier; A C Spradling; M Stapleton; R Strong; E Sun; R Svirskas; C Tector; R Turner; E Venter; A H Wang; X Wang; Z Y Wang; D A Wassarman; G M Weinstock; J Weissenbach; S M Williams; K C Worley; D Wu; S Yang; Q A Yao; J Ye; R F Yeh; J S Zaveri; M Zhan; G Zhang; Q Zhao; L Zheng; X H Zheng; F N Zhong; W Zhong; X Zhou; S Zhu; X Zhu; H O Smith; R A Gibbs; E W Myers; G M Rubin; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  How species evolve collectively: implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles.

Authors:  Carrie L Morjan; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Identification of a locus under complex positive selection in Drosophila simulans by haplotype mapping and composite-likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Yuseob Kim; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for a selective sweep in the wapl region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Steffen Beisswanger; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Yuseob Kim; Vanessa Bauer DuMont; Charles F Aquadro; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  DNA sequence polymorphism and divergence at the erect wing and suppressor of sable loci of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  John M Braverman; Brian P Lazzaro; Montserrat Aguadé; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Elevated polymorphism and divergence in the class C scavenger receptors of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  Brian P Lazzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Unusual pattern of nucleotide sequence variation at the OS-E and OS-F genomic regions of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia; Julio Rozas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A Composite-Likelihood Method for Detecting Incomplete Selective Sweep from Population Genomic Data.

Authors:  Ha My T Vy; Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Linkage disequilibrium and recent selection at three immunity receptor loci in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Todd A Schlenke; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.