Literature DB >> 14570548

Growth of brain stimulation reward as a function of duration and stimulation strength.

Bonnie Sonnenschein1, Kent Conover, Peter Shizgal.   

Abstract

The strength of a train of rewarding brain stimulation required to support a criterion level of operant performance declines hyperbolically as the duration is increased. This finding has been attributed to a process of leaky integration. However, the rate at which integration approaches asymptote has been shown to depend on stimulation strength, a finding that differs from the behavior of a simple leaky integrator. The authors replicate both findings and show that they are both well described by a new model that incorporates a hyperbolic strength-duration function, a logistic function mapping stimulation frequency onto reward intensity, and another logistic function mapping reward intensity onto performance. (c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14570548     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.5.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  9 in total

1.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  At what stage of neural processing does cocaine act to boost pursuit of rewards?

Authors:  Giovanni Hernandez; Yannick-André Breton; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A new view of the effect of dopamine receptor antagonism on operant performance for rewarding brain stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  I Trujillo-Pisanty; K Conover; P Shizgal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Brain stimulation reward is integrated by a network of electrically coupled GABA neurons.

Authors:  Matthew B Lassen; J Elliott Brown; Sarah H Stobbs; Seth H Gunderson; Levi Maes; C Fernando Valenzuela; Andrew P Ray; Steven J Henriksen; Scott C Steffensen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Scarce means with alternative uses: robbins' definition of economics and its extension to the behavioral and neurobiological study of animal decision making.

Authors:  Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca Brana Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Authors:  David N Velazquez-Martinez; Benita Lizeth Pacheco-Gomez; Ana Laura Toscano-Zapien; Maria Almudena Lopez-Guzman; Daniel Velazquez-Lopez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Dopamine and Beyond: Implications of Psychophysical Studies of Intracranial Self-Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression.

Authors:  Vasilios Pallikaras; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-08

9.  Validation and extension of the reward-mountain model.

Authors:  Yannick-André Breton; Ada Mullett; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.