Literature DB >> 14569932

[Results of a prospective randomized investigation [Russia (St.Petersburg)/WHO] to evaluate the significance of self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer].

V F Semiglazov1, A G Manikhas, V M Moiseenko, S A Protsenko, R S Kharikova, I K Seleznev, R T Popova, N Sh Migmanova, A A Orlov, N Iu Barash, O A Ivanova, V G Ivanov.   

Abstract

Indications for puncture or excision biopsy were significantly higher in the study group (7.5%) as compared with control (3.5%) (p < 0.01) in a randomized prospective controlled trial of a comprehensive breast cancer screening (123,748) carried out in the framework of a self-examination education program. In the self-examination group, detection rates were higher both for benign (1.1%) and malignant (0.85%) tumors than in control (0.5% and 0.69%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Early stage (T1NOMO, Tis) distribution difference in the study group and controls was insignificant--23 and 17.6%, respectively. Compliance with the program requirements including monthly or bimonthly self-examination was followed by higher 15-year survival rates (53.2%) in 70-75% as compared with controls(45.8%) (p = 0.05105): yet it did not affect mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vopr Onkol        ISSN: 0507-3758


  15 in total

1.  In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research.

Authors:  Laura Rosen; Orly Manor; Dan Engelhard; David Zucker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Clinical breast exam, and mammography in women referred to health centers in Tabriz, Iran.

Authors:  Azizeh Farshbaf Khalili; Mahnaz Shahnazi
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2012-05-26

4.  Cancer screening and prevention in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Aditi Shastri; Surendra Srinivas Shastri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Risk-Reducing Options for Women with a Hereditary Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Kari Tyne; Arpana Naik; Christina Bougatsos; Benjamin K Chan; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Evaluation of the Efficacy of Clinical Breast Examination Gloves in the Diagnosis of Breast Lumps.

Authors:  Vanessa Monteiro Sanvido; Andrea Yumi Watanabe; Joaquim Teodoro de Araújo Neto; Simone Elias; Gil Facina; Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

8.  Attitudes of midwifery students towards teaching breast-self examination.

Authors:  Andrej Plesnicar; Martina Golicnik; Irena Kirar Fazarinc; Bozo Kralj; Viljem Kovac; Blanka Kores Plesnicar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 9.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Kösters; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Consensus recommendations for advancing breast cancer: risk identification and screening in ethnically diverse younger women.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Thomas A Summers; John Eberhardt; Albert Cerussi; Warren Grundfest; Charles M Peterson; Michael Brazaitis; Elizabeth Krupinski; Harold Freeman
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.