Literature DB >> 14569447

Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly.

D B Johnson1, M R DiSiena, R D Fanelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy (CMSP) was first introduced in 1993 as a less painful and highly effective alternative to traditional operative hemorrhoidectomy. Although CMSP has many advantages over traditional hemorrhoidectomy, some authorities and insurers continue to regard it as an inpatient procedure and others have been slow to adopt this progressive technique. This study documents the safe and effective outpatient nature of this procedure.
METHODS: From December 2001 through August 2002, 33 patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing internal hemorrhoids were treated using circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy as outpatients at an ambulatory surgery center. Fourteen (42%) patients were treated using local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, 18 (55%) chose spinal anesthesia, and general anesthesia was used in one patient. Patients were evaluated postoperatively by telephone at 1 and 2 weeks, and seen in clinic at 4 weeks.
RESULTS: One patient (3%) required an emergency department visit for minor postoperative bleeding. None of our elderly patients required emergency department evaluation and none reported significant complications. Four patients (13%) required urinary catheter placement prior to discharge from the surgery center due to urinary retention. One patient (3%) developed an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, which resolved with antibiotic treatment. Two patients were seen earlier than 4 weeks at the surgeon's request; one was immunocompromised from chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoid, and one reported persistent pain during initial telephone follow-up. No complications were identified in either patient, and no additional complications have been noted to date.
CONCLUSIONS: CMSP is a safe, effective, time-efficient procedure for patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing hemorrhoids that can be performed safely in the ambulatory surgery center setting. Age is not a limiting factor in selecting patients for this safe outpatient procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569447     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8151-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.

Authors:  Y H Ho; W K Cheong; C Tsang; J Ho; K W Eu; C L Tang; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Nicolas Demartines; Alexander E Handschin; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-03

3.  Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia.

Authors:  F Gabrielli; M Chiarelli; U Cioffi; A Guttadauro; M De Simone; P Di Mauro; A Arriciati
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R G Molloy; D Kingsmore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Pavlidis; B Papaziogas; A Souparis; A Patsas; I Koutelidakis; T Papaziogas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Limited hemorrhoidectomy: results and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  T K Hayssen; M A Luchtefeld; A J Senagore
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.585

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  B Vinson-Bonnet; T Higuero; J L Faucheron; A Senejoux; F Pigot; L Siproudhis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Remco-Ja van Wensen; Maarten-H van Leuken; Koop Bosscha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy: experience of a single center with 445 cases.

Authors:  Cihan Uras; Bilgi Baca; Deniz Eren Boler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Massive prolapsed haemorrhoids managed by ablation and correction in a poor resourced area.

Authors:  Elroy Patrick Weledji; George Enow Orock; Leopold Aminde
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-11-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.