Literature DB >> 14569010

Elevated mutagenesis and decreased DNA repair at a transgene are associated with proliferation but not apoptosis in p53-deficient cells.

Jason H Bielas1, John A Heddle.   

Abstract

p53, the most commonly mutated gene in human tumors, is believed to play a crucial role in the prevention of cancer by protecting cells from mutation, a theory commonly known as the "Guardian of the Genome" hypothesis. There are two hypotheses as to how this can occur. In the first, p53 protects the genome by retarding the cell cycle, thus allowing more time for DNA repair. In the second, p53 reduces cancer by initiating apoptosis in damaged cells, thus making it impossible for these cells to become carcinogenic. This study directly tested these two theories in primary murine embryonic fibroblasts on a common genetic background with and without p53, using a lacI transgene as a mutational target. The data demonstrate that, as a direct consequence of cell cycle delay, p53 slowed the induction of mutations and decreased their frequency but had little effect on the frequency of apoptosis. This indicates that the function of p53 in cell cycle control is more important than the role of p53 in apoptosis, for mutation prevention, in any uniform cell population. Moreover, p53-mediated protection is further improved in slowly dividing cells, suggesting that p53 may be particularly important in protecting stem cells from mutation. The role of apoptosis in vivo, however, may be to remove whole tissue subpopulations that can be renewed by less sensitive stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569010      PMCID: PMC240708          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2235595100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Proliferation is necessary for both repair and mutation in transgenic mouse cells.

Authors:  J H Bielas; J A Heddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  p53 and apoptosis.

Authors:  T M Gottlieb; M Oren
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A more efficient Big Blue protocol improves transgene rescue and accuracy in a adduct and mutation measurement.

Authors:  Jason H Bielas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Cancer. A deadly inheritance.

Authors:  B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990 Dec 20-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Regulation of p53 in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  N D Lakin; S P Jackson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-12-13       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Requirement of wild-type p53 protein for maintenance of chromosomal integrity.

Authors:  M Honma; M Momose; H Tanabe; H Sakamoto; Y Yu; J B Little; T Sofuni; M Hayashi
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.784

8.  Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour types.

Authors:  J M Nigro; S J Baker; A C Preisinger; J M Jessup; R Hostetter; K Cleary; S H Bigner; N Davidson; S Baylin; P Devilee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Activation of Epstein-Barr virus latent genes protects human B cells from death by apoptosis.

Authors:  C D Gregory; C Dive; S Henderson; C A Smith; G T Williams; J Gordon; A B Rickinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Somatic stem cells and the kinetics of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  John Cairns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  The rate of spontaneous mutations in human myeloid cells.

Authors:  David J Araten; Ondrej Krejci; Kimberly Ditata; Mark Wunderlich; Katie J Sanders; Leah Zamechek; James C Mulloy
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Highly conserved regimes of neighbor-base-dependent mutation generated the background primary-structural heterogeneities along vertebrate chromosomes.

Authors:  Marcos A Antezana; I King Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Mutational heterogeneity in human cancers: origin and consequences.

Authors:  Jesse J Salk; Edward J Fox; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.472

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.