Literature DB >> 14568853

Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence.

Jeffrey A Meyerhardt1, Paul J Catalano, Deborah Schrag, John Z Ayanian, Daniel G Haller, Robert J Mayer, John S Macdonald, Al B Benson, Charles S Fuchs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies that use registry data have demonstrated superior long-term overall survival after curative surgical resection of colon cancer at hospitals where the volume of such surgeries is high. However, because such administrative data lack information on cancer recurrence, the true nature of this relation remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital procedure volume predicts long-term outcomes of colon cancer surgery.
DESIGN: Nested cohort study within a randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Intergroup 0089 national adjuvant colon cancer study conducted between 1988 and 1992. PATIENTS: 3161 patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Overall survival and recurrence-free survival, by hospital procedure volume as defined by Medicare claims data.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 5-year overall survival significantly differed across tertiles of hospital procedure volume (63.8% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 67.3% at high-volume hospitals; P = 0.04). After adjustment for other predictors of colon cancer outcome, the hazard ratio for overall mortality in patients treated at low-volume centers was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.32). However, the risk for cancer recurrence was not associated with hospital procedure volume. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 63.9% for patients who had resection at low-volume hospitals compared with 63.0% at high-volume hospitals (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03 [CI, 0.89 to 1.18]). These findings did not materially change after stratification by other potential demographic and clinical predictors of outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: According to prospectively recorded data from a large clinical trial, patients whose colon cancer was resected at low-volume hospitals experienced a higher risk for long-term mortality; however, this increased mortality was not attributable to differences in colon cancer recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14568853     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-8-200310210-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  26 in total

1.  Reducing defects in the use of interventions.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; David A Thompson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Elyn R Riedel; Colin B Begg; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Selwyn O Rogers; Robert E Wolf; Alan M Zaslavsky; William E Wright; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ann Gilligan; Joan Neuner; Xu Zhang; Rodney Sparapani; Purushottam W Laud; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.

Authors:  Rachael A Callcut; Tara M Breslin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Defining the volume-quality debate: is it the surgeon, the center, or the training?

Authors:  James Merlino
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

7.  Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Yutaka Matsuyama; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Clinical benefit of treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer at high volume facilities.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; Monty Aghazadeh; Brian J Miles; Raj Satkunasivam; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 9.  Health Care Policy and Outcomes after Colon and Rectal Surgery: What Is the Bigger Picture?-Cost Containment, Incentivizing Value, Transparency, and Centers of Excellence.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Stefan D Holubar; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

10.  Variations in referral patterns for hypophysectomies among pediatric patients with sellar and parasellar tumors.

Authors:  Debraj Mukherjee; Hasan A Zaidi; Thomas A Kosztowski; Aditya Halthore; George I Jallo; Roberto Salvatori; David C Chang; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.