Literature DB >> 14568097

A model using MT-like motion-opponent operators explains an illusory transformation in the optic flow field.

Constance S Royden1, Daniel M Conti.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a physiologically based model using motion-opponent operators to compute heading performs accurately for simulated observer translations. Here we show how this model can explain an illusory shift in the perceived focus of expansion of a radial flow field that occurs when a field of laterally moving dots is superimposed on a field of radially moving dots. Furthermore, we can use the model to predict the perceptual shift of the focus of expansion for novel visual stimuli. These results support the hypothesis that this illusion results from motion subtraction during the processing of optic flow fields.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14568097     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00481-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

Authors:  E Poljac; B Neggers; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Driving strategy alters neuronal responses to self-movement: cortical mechanisms of distracted driving.

Authors:  Sarita Kishore; Noah Hornick; Nobuya Sato; William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cortical neurons combine visual cues about self-movement.

Authors:  Nobuya Sato; Sarita Kishore; William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.