Literature DB >> 14566740

Clinical assessment of tibial polyethylene thickness: comparison of radiographic measurements with as-implanted and as-retrieved thicknesses.

Matthew B Collier1, Brian A Jewett, C Anderson Engh.   

Abstract

Sixty-six posterior cruciate-retaining inserts of one fixed-bearing design were revised because of wear or osteolysis. Tibial polyethylene thickness was estimated from standard anteroposterior radiographs and compared with the original or final minimum thicknesses. The most accurate method involved measuring the shortest distance from each femoral condyle to a transverse line through the middle of the baseplate's superior surface. On radiographs acquired 6 weeks after arthroplasty, the mean error was -0.1 mm (underestimate) +/- 0.6 mm (standard deviation), with 72% of the measurements within 0.5 mm of the original minimum thickness and 87% within 1.0 mm. The method was less accurate for radiographs made before revision, for which the mean error was 0.6 mm (overestimate) +/- 1.0 mm. In this study, 41% and 70% of the prerevision measurements were accurate to within 0.5 and 1.0 mm, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566740     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00272-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Can microcomputed tomography measure retrieved polyethylene wear? Comparing fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Rebecca L Zimmerman; Robert H Hopper; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Christopher B Knowlton; Deborah J Hall; Michel P Laurent; Robert M Urban; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Polyethylene quality affects revision knee liner exchange survivorship.

Authors:  C Anderson Engh; Nancy L Parks; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiostereometric Analysis Permits In Vivo Measurement of Very Small Levels of Wear in TKA.

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Jacob Wihlidal; Richard W McCalden; Xunhua Yuan; Steven J MacDonald; Brent A Lanting; Douglas D Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Validation of a model-based measurement of the minimum insert thickness of knee prostheses: a retrieval study.

Authors:  E A van IJsseldijk; M K Harman; J Luetzner; E R Valstar; B C Stoel; R G H H Nelissen; B L Kaptein
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.