Literature DB >> 14566116

Diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal stab wounds: a prospective, randomized study.

Ari Leppäniemi1, Reijo Haapiainen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for identifying patients with abdominal stab wounds requiring surgical repair has not been defined. The potential benefits of diagnostic laparoscopy by incorporating it into the routine diagnostic workup of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds was evaluated in a two-layer, randomized study.
METHODS: From May 1997 through January 2002, stable patients without peritonitis but with demonstrated peritoneal violation were randomized (A) to exploratory laparotomy (AEL) (n = 23) or diagnostic laparoscopy (ADL) (n = 20). Simultaneously, patients with equivocal peritoneal violation on local wound exploration were randomized (B) to diagnostic laparoscopy (BDL) (n = 28) or expectant nonoperative management (BNOM) (n = 31). Hospital morbidity, length of stay, and costs were primary endpoints, with postdischarge disability being a secondary endpoint.
RESULTS: In patients with peritoneal penetration (AEL vs. ADL), there were minimal differences in the therapeutic operation rate (8 of 23 [AEL] vs. 8 of 20 [ADL], p = 0.761), mortality (none), morbidity (3 of 23 vs. 2 of 20, p = 0.999), hospital stay (mean +/- SD) (5.7 +/- 2.5 vs. 5.1 +/- 4.0 days, p = 0.049), hospital costs (4.6 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.9 x 1,000 EUR, p = 0.576), and length of sick leave (34 +/- 12 vs. 29 +/- 11 days, p = 0.305). In patients with equivocal peritoneal penetration (BDL vs. BNOM), laparoscopy found more mostly minor organ injuries (7 of 28 [BDL] vs. 1 of 31 [BNOM], p = 0.022) with no significant difference in therapeutic operations (3 of 28 vs. 1 of 31, p = 0.337) or morbidity (3 of 28 vs. 0 of 31, p = 0.101), but was associated with increased length of stay (2.6 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.8 days, p = 0.022), hospital costs (4.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 1.1 x 1,000 EUR, p = 0.000), and sick leave requirements (18 of 23 vs. 8 of 28 of eligible patients, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In patients with demonstrated peritoneal violation, laparoscopy offers little benefit over exploratory laparotomy. In patients with equivocal peritoneal penetration on local wound exploration, laparoscopy detects more mostly minor organ injuries than expectant nonoperative management but is associated with increased hospital stay, costs, and sick leave requirements. Overall, diagnostic laparoscopy cannot be recommended as a routine diagnostic tool in anterolateral abdominal and thoracoabdominal stab wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566116     DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000063000.05274.A4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  35 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arianna Birindelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Ferdinando Agresta; Matteo Mandrioli; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yueli Li; Ying Xiang; Na Wu; Long Wu; Zubin Yu; Mengxuan Zhang; Minghao Wang; Jun Jiang; Yafei Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  [Laparoscopy for abdominal trauma].

Authors:  H P Becker; A Willms; R Schwab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  The role of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric trauma: a collective review.

Authors:  Nicole E Sharp; George W Holcomb
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Laparoscopic removal of an occult foreign body causing penetrating abdominal trauma in a child.

Authors:  Ram V Anantha; Rodrick K Lim; Neil H Merritt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for acute abdominal conditions: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William S Richardson; Lily Chang; David B Earle; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  The Use of Laparoscopy in the Management of Trauma Patients: Brief review.

Authors:  Yehia B A El-Bendary; Juhaina Al-Adawi; Hani Al-Qadhi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 9.  Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Walter L Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of triple-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for detection of penetrating gastrointestinal injury: a prospective study.

Authors:  Nitima Saksobhavivat; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Alexis R Boscak; Clint W Sliker; Deborah M Stein; Uttam K Bodanapally; Krystal Archer-Arroyo; Lisa A Miller; Thorsten R Fleiter; Melvin T Alexander; Stuart E Mirvis; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.