Literature DB >> 14565651

Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Andrew Grigg1, Philippe Solal-Celigny, Peter Hoskin, Kerry Taylor, Andrew McMillan, Roswitha Forstpointner, Pamela Bacon, Jennifer Renwick, Wolfgang Hiddemann.   

Abstract

Pegfilgrastim is composed of the protein filgrastim to which a 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) is covalently bound at the N-terminal residue resulting in decreased renal clearance and increased plasma half-life compared with filgrastim. This open-label, randomized, phase 2 study compared two doses of single administration pegfilgrastim (60 and 100 microg/kg) with daily doses of filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day) or no cytokine treatment after standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 50 elderly patients. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 4 (severe) neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) in cycle 1. Duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 2.2 (SD 1.2), 1.5 (SD 1.1), 0.8 (1.2) and 5.0 (2.0) days for patients who received pegfilgrastim 60 microg/kg, pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg, filgrastim 5 microg/kg and no cytokine, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were imbalanced with increased bone-marrow involvement and prior therapy in the former. When the treatment groups were balanced for these risk factors, duration of grade 4 neutropenia was comparable with 2.0 and 3.0 vs. 0.6 and 0.5 days for pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg and filgrastim patients with and without these risk factors, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (defined as ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l and temperature > 38.2degrees C) was low (10% of patients). Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to daily filgrastim. Once per chemotherapy cycle administration of pegfilgrastim was comparable to filgrastim in this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14565651     DOI: 10.1080/1042819031000103953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  34 in total

Review 1.  Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for autologous hematopoietic SCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M G Kim; N Han; E-K Lee; T Kim
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  A retrospective analysis on arteritis after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  Ken Sasaki; Kensuke Matsuda; Masashi Miyauchi; Akira Honda; Arika Shimura; Yosuke Masamoto; Mineo Kurokawa
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 3.  Prophylactic long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) in gynecologic malignancies: an oncologic expert statement.

Authors:  Edgar Petru; Christian F Singer; Stephan Polterauer; Arik Galid; Christian Schauer; Johann Klocker; Michael Seifert; Alexander Reinthaller; Christoph Benedicic; Michael Hubalek; Lukas Hefler; Christian Marth; Tonja Scholl-Firon; Gerhard Bogner; Alain-Gustave Zeimet
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-10-15

4.  Impact of pegylated filgrastim in comparison to filgrastim for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) on high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation chemotherapy.

Authors:  Grace Kam; Richard Yiu; Yvonne Loh; Ai Leen Ang; Ling Ling Yueh; Yeow Tee Goh; Gee Chuan Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  H Xu; Q Gong; F D Vogl; M Reiner; J H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Achieving full-dose, on-schedule administration of ACE chemotherapy every 14 days for the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Pirker; E Ulsperger; J Messner; K Aigner; B Forstner; P Bacon; V Easton; T Skacel
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 7.  Implications of the European Organisation for Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for lymphoma care.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; Matti Aapro; Ercole Brusamolino; Dolores Caballero; Bertrand Coiffier; Michael Pfreundschuh; Marek Trneny; Jan Walewski
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the novel human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor derivative Maxy-G34 and pegfilgrastim in rats.

Authors:  M Scholz; C Engel; D Apt; S L Sankar; E Goldstein; M Loeffler
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.831

9.  A pharmacokinetic model of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim application in normal mice and those with cyclophosphamide-induced granulocytopaenia.

Authors:  M Scholz; M Ackermann; C Engel; F Emmrich; M Loeffler; M Kamprad
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

10.  Effectiveness of cytopenia prophylaxis for different filgrastim and pegfilgrastim schedules in a chemotherapy mouse model.

Authors:  Markus Scholz; Manuela Ackermann; Frank Emmrich; Markus Loeffler; Manja Kamprad
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.