Literature DB >> 17235728

Achieving full-dose, on-schedule administration of ACE chemotherapy every 14 days for the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.

R Pirker1, E Ulsperger, J Messner, K Aigner, B Forstner, P Bacon, V Easton, T Skacel.   

Abstract

Extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is commonly treated with multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Reducing the time interval between cycles of chemotherapy (dose-dense chemotherapy) may improve outcomes in the treatment of extensive SCLC, as it has in other chemosensitive malignancies. To evaluate the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC, this study evaluates a dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (ACE) regimen, supported by the once-per-cycle administration of the hematopoietic growth factor pegfilgrastim. Patients received up to six 14-day cycles of ACE chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m,(2) cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 IV, plus oral etoposide 240 mg/m(2) daily on days 2-3). On day 4 of each cycle, patients received pegfilgrastim 6 mg by subcutaneous injection. Of 30 patients enrolled, 27 started chemotherapy and received pegfilgrastim. Full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy was given to all 22 patients starting cycle 2, and in 107 (88%) of 121 cycles. Eighteen of the 27 patients (67%) received full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy for all 6 cycles. The overall response rate was 17/27 (63%). Nine patients (33%) experienced hematologic toxicities that investigators considered severe or life-threatening. Four patients (15%) had febrile neutropenia. Full-dose, on-schedule dose-dense ACE chemotherapy is feasible with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim support in extensive SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17235728     DOI: 10.1007/s00408-005-2594-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   2.584


  29 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma. A multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables.

Authors:  R Epelbaum; D Faraggi; Y Ben-Arie; M Ben-Shahar; N Haim; Y Ron; E Robinson; Y Cohen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; S E Jones; J O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; T George; M Savin; D Richards; J Glaspy; L Meza; G Cohen; M Dhami; D R Budman; J Hackett; M Brassard; B B Yang; B C Liang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; David C Dale; Jonathan Friedberg; Jeffrey Crawford; Richard I Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: application to LNH-87 protocol. The GELA. (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte).

Authors:  E Lepage; C Gisselbrecht; C Haioun; C Sebban; H Tilly; A Bosly; P Morel; R Herbrecht; F Reyes; B Coiffier
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  V Trillet-Lenoir; J Green; C Manegold; J Von Pawel; U Gatzemeier; B Lebeau; A Depierre; P Johnson; G Decoster; D Tomita
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Randomized multicentre trial of filgrastim as an adjunct to combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. West of Scotland Lymphoma Group.

Authors:  D J Dunlop; M M Eatock; J Paul; S Anderson; N S Reed; M Soukop; N Lucie; E J Fitzsimmons; P Tansey; W P Steward
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL.

Authors:  Michael Pfreundschuh; Lorenz Trümper; Marita Kloess; Rudolf Schmits; Alfred C Feller; Christian Rübe; Christian Rudolph; Marcel Reiser; Dieter K Hossfeld; Hartmut Eimermacher; Dirk Hasenclever; Norbert Schmitz; Markus Loeffler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Can cytotoxic dose-intensity be increased by using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor? A randomized controlled trial of lenograstim in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P J Woll; J Hodgetts; L Lomax; F Bildet; V Cour-Chabernaud; N Thatcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Prophylactic long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) in gynecologic malignancies: an oncologic expert statement.

Authors:  Edgar Petru; Christian F Singer; Stephan Polterauer; Arik Galid; Christian Schauer; Johann Klocker; Michael Seifert; Alexander Reinthaller; Christoph Benedicic; Michael Hubalek; Lukas Hefler; Christian Marth; Tonja Scholl-Firon; Gerhard Bogner; Alain-Gustave Zeimet
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Yang; Anna Kido
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  H Xu; Q Gong; F D Vogl; M Reiner; J H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Reshma Mahtani; Jeffrey Crawford; Sinéad M Flannery; Tatiana Lawrence; Jennifer Schenfeld; Prasad L Gawade
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.