Literature DB >> 14563792

Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures.

Berton R Moed1, Paul H Yu, Konrad I Gruson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is a validated, well-designed, self-administered questionnaire that is useful for determining health status. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score is the most generally accepted clinical grading system for evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and modified Merle d'Aubigné scores in evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with an acetabular fracture met the criteria for inclusion in the present study, which included a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up, a complete physical examination with use of the Merle d'Aubigné score, and successful completion of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire. Patients were stratified according to a number of factors, including the type of fracture and whether the fracture was an isolated injury or was part of a multiple-injury complex. The mean duration of follow-up was five years (range, two to seventeen years).
RESULTS: The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné score was 16.8 (range, 9 to 18), and the mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 24.9 (range, 0 to 79). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the Merle d'Aubigné score and the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was -0.61 (p < 0.0001). Stratification of the patients did not alter these overall results. However, the presence or absence of associated injuries was a significant factor for the Merle d'Aubigné score (p = 0.03). In addition, the Merle d'Aubigné score data were asymmetric, demonstrating a ceiling effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for these patients were relatively high compared with those for the normal population, indicating that complete return to a preinjury functional level is uncommon despite a good-to-excellent Merle d'Aubigné clinical score. Furthermore, the ceiling effect demonstrated by the Merle d'Aubigné score (despite its high correlation with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score) limits its usefulness as a method for evaluating the outcome of treatment of acetabular fractures. There have been few published clinical studies in which the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score has been used as an outcome measure, and reference values are lacking. The present study provides initial guideline reference values for use in the evaluation of patients following an acetabular fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14563792     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Development and validation of an instrument to predict functional recovery in tibial fracture patients: the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping (SPOC) questionnaire.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari; Gordon H Guyatt; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Scott Mandel; David Sanders; Emil Schemitsch; Mark Swiontkowski; Paul Tornetta; Eugene Wai; Stephen D Walter
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Early reduction of acetabular fractures decreases the risk of post-traumatic hip osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Mario Cahueque; Marcos Martínez; Andrés Cobar; María Bregni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-01-13

3.  Factors affecting the functional outcome of surgically managed displaced acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Najmul Huda; Mir Shahid Ul Islam; Sandeep Bishnoi; Kausamb Utsav
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Psychological distress and quality of life after orthopedic trauma: an observational study.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Jason W Busse; Beate P Hanson; Pamela Leece; Olufemi R Ayeni; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Comparison and agreement of outcome scores through nine months after acetabular fracture fixation.

Authors:  José Luis Ramirez-Garcialuna; Fernando Dominguez-Paulin; Jesús Ramirez-Martinez; Luis Fernando Sanmiguel-Delgadillo
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-08-24

Review 6.  Delayed presentation of complex acetabular fractures: Review of literature on outcome of internal fixations with reference to extended ilio-femoral approach.

Authors:  Chitta Prasad Das; Mehool R Acharya; Vipul R Makwana
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-20

7.  WHOQOL-BREF Hindi questionnaire: Quality of life assessment in acetabular fracture patients.

Authors:  Umesh K Meena; Ramesh K Sen; Prateek Behera; Sujit K Tripathy; Sameer Aggrawal; Sreekanth R Rajoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Complications in patients of acetabular fractures and the factors affecting the quality of reduction in surgically treated cases.

Authors:  Karan Jindal; Sameer Aggarwal; Prasoon Kumar; Vishal Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-02-22

9.  Outcome after Surgical Management of Acetabular Fractures: A 7-Year Experience.

Authors:  Seyed Amir Reza Mesbahi; Ali Ghaemmaghami; Sara Ghaemmaghami; Pouya Farhadi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-01

10.  Associated lesions in posterior wall acetabular fractures: not a valid predictor of failure.

Authors:  Lukas Daniel Iselin; Peter Wahl; Patrick Studer; Jacob T Munro; Emanuel Gautier
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.