Literature DB >> 14563405

Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.

I Kimber1, D A Basketter, M Butler, A Gamer, J-L Garrigue, G F Gerberick, C Newsome, W Steiling, H-W Vohr.   

Abstract

It is clear that contact allergens vary substantially with regard to the relative potency with which they are able to induce skin sensitisation. Considerations of potency will in the future become a significant factor in the classification of skin sensitising chemicals. It is therefore appropriate to establish what is known of potency and thresholds in the induction of skin sensitisation and the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis, and to identify approaches that might be available for assessment of relative potency for the purposes of categorising chemical allergens. This paper was prepared by an ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology) Task Force that had the objective of recommending approaches for the measurement of potency and definition of thresholds for both the induction and elicitation of contact sensitisation. The deliberations recorded here build upon recommendations made previously by an ECETOC Task Force that considered the conduct of standard skin sensitisation test methods for the purposes of hazard identification and risk assessment (ECETOC, Monograph No. 29, Brussels, 2000). The emphasis in this present paper is also on standard and accepted methods for the assessment of skin sensitisation, and for which OECD guidelines are available: the local lymph node assay (LLNA), the guinea pig maximisation test and the occluded patch test of Buehler. For various reasons, discussed in detail herein, attention focused primarily upon consideration of categorisation of chemical allergens and the identification of thresholds with respect to the induction of skin sensitisation, rather than the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. It is concluded that although the LLNA is the method of choice for the determination of skin sensitisation potency for the purposes of categorisation, if data are already available from appropriate guinea pig tests then their judicious interpretation may provide information of value in determinations of potency and categorisation. Included here are detailed and specific recommendations for how best the results of the three test methods considered can be used for the categorisation of chemical allergens as a function of skin sensitisation potency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14563405     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(03)00223-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  10 in total

1.  Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Resin monomers act as adjuvants in Ni-induced allergic dermatitis in vivo.

Authors:  K Bando; H Takahashi; M Kinbara; Y Tanaka; T Kuroishi; K Sasaki; T Takano-Yamamoto; S Sugawara; Y Endo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and In Silico Predictions.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Lennart T Anger; Romualdo Benigni; David Bower; Frank Bringezu; Kevin M Crofton; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Magdalena Dettwiler; Markus Frericks; Fjodor Melnikov; Scott Miller; David W Roberts; Diana Suarez-Rodriguez; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Elena Lo Piparo; Raymond R Tice; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-08

4.  An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers.

Authors:  Jessica C Graham; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Martyn L Chilton; Jakub Kostal; Joel Bercu; Gregory L Beutner; Uma S Bruen; David G Dolan; Stephen Gomez; Jedd Hillegass; John Nicolette; Matthew Schmitz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.973

5.  A dual luciferase assay for evaluation of skin sensitizing potential of medical devices.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mertl; Elisabeth Riegel; Nicole Glück; Gabriele Ettenberger-Bornberg; Grace Lin; Sabrina Auer; Magdalena Haller; Angelika Wlodarczyk; Christoph Steurer; Christian Kirchnawy; Thomas Czerny
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Malin Lindstedt; Ann-Sofie Albrekt; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Primary irritant and delayed-contact hypersensitivity reactions to the freshwater cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii and its associated toxin cylindrospermopsin.

Authors:  Ian Stewart; Alan A Seawright; Philip J Schluter; Glen R Shaw
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2006-03-31

Review 8.  In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Sussan Ghassabian; Maree T Smith; Ai-Leen Lam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Skin sensitizers differentially regulate signaling pathways in MUTZ-3 cells in relation to their individual potency.

Authors:  Ann-Sofie Albrekt; Henrik Johansson; Anna Börje; Carl Borrebaeck; Malin Lindstedt
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Prediction of chemical respiratory sensitizers using GARD, a novel in vitro assay based on a genomic biomarker signature.

Authors:  Andy Forreryd; Henrik Johansson; Ann-Sofie Albrekt; Carl A K Borrebaeck; Malin Lindstedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.