Literature DB >> 14561317

Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. II. Effects on individual species.

M S Heard1, C Hawes, G T Champion, S J Clark, L G Firbank, A J Haughton, A M Parish, J N Perry, P Rothery, D B Roy, R J Scott, M P Skellern, G R Squire, M O Hill.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) and conventional beet, maize and spring oilseed rape on 12 weed species. We sampled the seedbank before and after cropping. During the season we counted plants and measured seed rain and biomass. Ratios of densities were used to calculate emergence, survival, reproduction and seedbank change. Treatments significantly affected the biomass of six species in beet, eight in maize and five in spring oilseed rape. The effects were generally consistent, with biomass lower in GMHT beet and spring oilseed rape and higher in GMHT maize. With few exceptions, emergence was higher in GMHT crops. Subsequent survival was significantly lowered for eight species in beet and six in spring oilseed rape in the GMHT treatments. It was increased for five species in maize and one in spring oilseed rape. Significant effects on seedbank change were found for four species. However, for many species in beet and spring oilseed rape (19 out of 24 cases), seed densities were lower in the seedbank after GMHT cropping. These differences compounded over time would result in large decreases in population densities of arable weeds. In maize, populations may increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561317      PMCID: PMC1693275          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  5 in total

1.  Genetically modified plants - the debate continues.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

Authors:  A R Watkinson; R P Freckleton; R A Robinson; W J Sutherland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Agriculture. Genetically modified crops and farmland biodiversity.

Authors:  L G Firbank; F Forcella
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybeans.

Authors:  L D Buckelew; L P Pedigo; H M Mero; M D Owen; G L Tylka
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity.

Authors:  M S Heard; C Hawes; G T Champion; S J Clark; L G Firbank; A J Haughton; A M Parish; J N Perry; P Rothery; R J Scott; M P Skellern; G R Squire; M O Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet for spring and autumn environmental benefit.

Authors:  Mike J May; Gillian T Champion; Alan M Dewar; Aiming Qi; John D Pidgeon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant cropping systems on weed seedbanks in two years of following crops.

Authors:  L G Firbank; P Rothery; M J May; S J Clark; R J Scott; R C Stuart; C W H Boffey; D R Brooks; G T Champion; A J Haughton; C Hawes; M S Heard; A M Dewar; J N Perry; G R Squire
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Mitigation of indirect environmental effects of GM crops.

Authors:  J D Pidgeon; M J May; J N Perry; G M Poppy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Weed seed resources for birds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

Authors:  David W Gibbons; David A Bohan; Peter Rothery; Rick C Stuart; Alison J Haughton; Rod J Scott; Jeremy D Wilson; Joe N Perry; Suzanne J Clark; Robert J G Dawson; Les G Firbank
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Mathias Cougnon; Sofie Vergucht; Robert Bulcke; Geert Haesaert; Walter Steurbaut; Dirk Reheul
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. II. Within-field epigeal and aerial arthropods.

Authors:  A J Haughton; G T Champion; C Hawes; M S Heard; D R Brooks; D A Bohan; S J Clark; A M Dewar; L G Firbank; J L Osborne; J N Perry; P Rothery; D B Roy; R J Scott; I P Woiwod; C Birchall; M P Skellern; J H Walker; P Baker; E L Browne; A J G Dewar; B H Garner; L A Haylock; S L Horne; N S Mason; R J N Sands; M J Walker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Estimating the effects of Cry1F Bt-maize pollen on non-target Lepidoptera using a mathematical model of exposure.

Authors:  Joe N Perry; Yann Devos; Salvatore Arpaia; Detlef Bartsch; Christina Ehlert; Achim Gathmann; Rosemary S Hails; Niels B Hendriksen; Jozsef Kiss; Antoine Messéan; Sylvie Mestdagh; Gerd Neemann; Marco Nuti; Jeremy B Sweet; Christoph C Tebbe
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.528

Review 8.  Herbicide resistance and biodiversity: agronomic and environmental aspects of genetically modified herbicide-resistant plants.

Authors:  Gesine Schütte; Michael Eckerstorfer; Valentina Rastelli; Wolfram Reichenbecher; Sara Restrepo-Vassalli; Marja Ruohonen-Lehto; Anne-Gabrielle Wuest Saucy; Martha Mertens
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 5.893

9.  Limits of Concern: suggestions for the operationalisation of a concept to determine the relevance of adverse effects in the ERA of GMOs.

Authors:  Marion Dolezel; Marianne Miklau; Andreas Heissenberger; Wolfram Reichenbecher
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.893

10.  Policy-Led Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Crops: Testing for Increased Risk Rather Than Profiling Phenotypes Leads to Predictable and Transparent Decision-Making.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Phil Macdonald
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.