OBJECTIVE: To validate the six-item short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for usage in screening outcomes in a Dutch population receiving preconception counseling. METHODS: Men and women completed the 20-item full form of the STAI before (n = 310) and after preconception counseling (n = 147). Prorated scores of the six-item form were compared to the full form using Pearson's correlation coefficients and paired t tests. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the Dutch translation of the short-form of the STAI-state was 0.83. The short form highly correlates with the full form (r = 0.95). The short form was able to discriminate between different levels of anxiety and was sensitive to change. CONCLUSION: The Dutch translation of the short form of the STAI-state has good reliability and validity and was found to be useful as a quick tool to evaluate the effectiveness of screening programs on anxiety levels. We believe our results will be applicable to other populations, although this needs to be confirmed in other studies. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
OBJECTIVE: To validate the six-item short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for usage in screening outcomes in a Dutch population receiving preconception counseling. METHODS:Men and women completed the 20-item full form of the STAI before (n = 310) and after preconception counseling (n = 147). Prorated scores of the six-item form were compared to the full form using Pearson's correlation coefficients and paired t tests. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the Dutch translation of the short-form of the STAI-state was 0.83. The short form highly correlates with the full form (r = 0.95). The short form was able to discriminate between different levels of anxiety and was sensitive to change. CONCLUSION: The Dutch translation of the short form of the STAI-state has good reliability and validity and was found to be useful as a quick tool to evaluate the effectiveness of screening programs on anxiety levels. We believe our results will be applicable to other populations, although this needs to be confirmed in other studies. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Jennifer L Steel; Lauren Terhorst; Kevin P Collins; David A Geller; Yoram Vodovotz; Juliana Kim; Andrew Krane; Michael Antoni; James W Marsh; Lora E Burke; Lisa H Butterfield; Frank J Penedo; Daniel J Buysse; Allan Tsung Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Mirjam P J Bogaarts; Brenda L Den Oudsten; Jan A Roukema; Johanna M G H Van Riel; Laurens V Beerepoot; Jolanda De Vries Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Arno van Peperstraten; Willianne Nelen; Richard Grol; Gerhard Zielhuis; Eddy Adang; Peep Stalmeier; Rosella Hermens; Jan Kremer Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-09-30
Authors: K A M van den Bergh; M L Essink-Bot; G J J M Borsboom; E Th Scholten; M Prokop; H J de Koning; R J van Klaveren Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: H Jolanda van Rijssen; Antonius J M Schellart; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 3.295