Literature DB >> 14559846

Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status.

Matthew J Ellis1, Andrew Coop, Baljit Singh, Yu Tao, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Fritz Jänicke, Louis Mauriac, Erhard Quebe-Fehling, Hilary A Chaudri-Ross, Dean B Evans, William R Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biological basis for the superior efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive locally advanced breast cancer was investigated by analyzing tumor proliferation and expression of estrogen-regulated genes before and after the initiation of therapy.
METHODS: Tumor samples were obtained at baseline and at the end of treatment from 185 patients participating in a double blind randomized Phase III study of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These paired specimens were simultaneously analyzed for Ki67, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), trefoil factor 1 (PS2), HER1 (epidermal growth factor receptor), and HER2 (ErbB2 or neu) by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The treatment-induced reduction in geometric mean Ki67 was significantly greater with letrozole (87%) than tamoxifen (75%; analysis of covariance P = 0.0009). Differences in the average Ki67 reduction were particularly marked for ER-positive tumors that overexpressed HER1 and/or HER2 (88 versus 45%, respectively; P = 0.0018). Twenty-three of 92 tumors (25%) on tamoxifen and 14 of 93 on letrozole (15%) showed a paradoxical increase in Ki67 with treatment, and the majority of these cases was HER1/2 negative. Letrozole, but not tamoxifen, significantly reduced expression of the estrogen-regulated proteins PgR and trefoil factor 1, regardless of HER1/2 status (P < 0.0001). ER down-regulation occurred with both agents, although levels decreased more with tamoxifen (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Letrozole inhibited tumor proliferation to a greater extent than tamoxifen. The molecular basis for this advantage appears complex but includes possible tamoxifen agonist effects on the cell cycle in both HER1/2+ and HER1/2- tumors. A pattern of continued proliferation despite appropriate down-regulation of PgR expression with estrogen deprivation or tamoxifen was also documented. This observation suggests the estrogenic regulation of proliferation and PgR expression may be dissociated in endocrine therapy resistant cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  59 in total

1.  Value of pre-treatment biomarkers in prediction of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Ying; Yingjian He; Meng Qi; Bin Dong; Aiping Lu; Jinfeng Li; Yuntao Xie; Tianfeng Wang; Benyao Lin; Tao Ouyang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Optimizing the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Laila S Agrawal; Ingrid A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer: from bedside to bench and back again?

Authors:  R R Saleh; N Bouganim; J Hilton; A Arnaout; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Pathways to tamoxifen resistance.

Authors:  Rebecca B Riggins; Randy S Schrecengost; Michael S Guerrero; Amy H Bouton
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  Personalized medicine and pharmacogenetic biomarkers: progress in molecular oncology testing.

Authors:  Frank S Ong; Kingshuk Das; Jay Wang; Hana Vakil; Jane Z Kuo; Wendell-Lamar B Blackwell; Stephen W Lim; Mark O Goodarzi; Kenneth E Bernstein; Jerome I Rotter; Wayne W Grody
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool.

Authors:  Y H Chia; M J Ellis; C X Ma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Aromatase expression and outcomes in the P024 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; William R Miller; Yu Tao; Dean B Evans; Hilary A Chaudri Ross; Yasuhiro Miki; Takashi Suzuki; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  An updated review on the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  S Verma; S Sehdev; A Joy; Y Madarnas; J Younus; J A Roy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Who would have thought a single Ki67 measurement would predict long-term outcome?

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Roger A'Hern; Janine Salter; Lila Zabaglo; Ian E Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.