Literature DB >> 14559304

[Advantages of using robotic Da Vinci system for unilateral adrenalectomy: early results].

L Brunaud1, L Bresler, A Ayav, S Tretou, L Cormier, M Klein, P Boissel.   

Abstract

STUDY AIM: The goal of this study was to report the early results of unilateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy using robotic Da Vinci system, and to compare them to the results of the laparoscopic standard adrenalectomy.
METHODS: Prospective study included all patients operated on for unilateral laparoscopic or robotic adrenalectomy from November 2000 to November 2002.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent unilateral adrenalectomy using either standard laparoscopy (14 patients) or robotic Da Vinci system (14 patients). Mean duration of robotic adrenalectomy seemed to be longer than standard laparoscopy (111 vs. 83 min; P = 0.057). This tendency decreased while surgeons' experience was increasing. Mean duration of operating room activity was similar for both types of surgery. Peroperative events without conversion, conversion rate (7%), drainage, morbidity (21%), duration of hospitalisation were similar for both types of surgery. Duration of standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy was positively correlated to patients body mass index. This correlation was absent in patients operated on by robotic Da Vinci system.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study found no objective data demonstrating that robotic Da Vinci system was superior to standard laparoscopic approach for unilateral adrenalectomy. However, we think that it is necessary to continue further evaluation of this system to demonstrate its possible superiority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559304     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(03)00220-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir        ISSN: 0003-3944


  18 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; J Hubert; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

Review 3.  Robotic endocrine surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Halit Eren Taskin; Naciye Cigdem Arslan; Shamil Aliyev; Eren Berber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Robotic adrenalectomy by an open surgeon: are outcomes different?

Authors:  Shankar R Raman; Emil Shakov; Nino Carnevale; Anusak Yiengpruksawan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-08

5.  Robotic clipless transperitoneal adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Xinying Li; Saleh A Massasati; Emad Kandil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 6.  Robotic endocrine surgery: technical details and review of the literature.

Authors:  Volkan Genc; Orhan Agcaoglu; Eren Berber
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

7.  Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Morino; G Benincà; G Giraudo; G M Del Genio; F Rebecchi; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Does robotic adrenalectomy improve patient quality of life when compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy?

Authors:  Laurent Brunaud; Laurent Bresler; Rasa Zarnegar; Ahmet Ayav; Luc Cormier; Sebastien Tretou; Patrick Boissel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9. 

Authors:  Jeff Warren; Vitor da Silva; Yves Caumartin; Patrick P W Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: a review of the national inpatient sample.

Authors:  Sarah Samreen; Marcus Fluck; Marie Hunsinger; Jeffrey Wild; Mohsen Shabahang; Joseph A Blansfield
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.