Literature DB >> 14558590

Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty.

Karl Grammer1, Bernhard Fink, Anders P Møller, Randy Thornhill.   

Abstract

Current theoretical and empirical findings suggest that mate preferences are mainly cued on visual, vocal and chemical cues that reveal health including developmental health. Beautiful and irresistible features have evolved numerous times in plants and animals due to sexual selection, and such preferences and beauty standards provide evidence for the claim that human beauty and obsession with bodily beauty are mirrored in analogous traits and tendencies throughout the plant and animal kingdoms. Human beauty standards reflect our evolutionary distant and recent past and emphasize the role of health assessment in mate choice as reflected by analyses of the attractiveness of visual characters of the face and the body, but also of vocal and olfactory signals. Although beauty standards may vary between cultures and between times, we show in this review that the underlying selection pressures, which shaped the standards, are the same. Moreover we show that it is not the content of the standards that show evidence of convergence--it is the rules or how we construct beauty ideals that have universalities across cultures. These findings have implications for medical, social and biological sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14558590     DOI: 10.1017/s1464793102006085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  70 in total

1.  Changes in adipocytes and dendritic cells in lymph node containing adipose depots during and after many weeks of mild inflammation.

Authors:  Dawn Sadler; Christine A Mattacks; Caroline M Pond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Did the perils of abdominal obesity affect depiction of feminine beauty in the sixteenth to eighteenth century British literature? Exploring the health and beauty link.

Authors:  Devendra Singh; Peter Renn; Adrian Singh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty; Grace L Jackson; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-10-14

4.  The effect of incobotulinumtoxin a and dermal filler treatment on perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female faces.

Authors:  Bernhard Fink; Michael Prager
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-01

5.  Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio.

Authors:  Marzia Del Zotto; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Self-face recognition in social context.

Authors:  Motoaki Sugiura; Yuko Sassa; Hyeonjeong Jeong; Keisuke Wakusawa; Kaoru Horie; Shigeru Sato; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  What Makes a Partner Ideal, and for Whom? Compatibility Tests, Filter Tests, and the Mating Stability Matrix.

Authors:  Lorenza Lucchi Basili; Pier Luigi Sacco
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-02

8.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Humans as a model species for sexual selection research.

Authors:  Michael Lawrence Wilson; Carrie M Miller; Kristin N Crouse
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.

Authors:  Nick Neave; Sarah Laing; Bernhard Fink; John T Manning
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.