Literature DB >> 14557607

Stimulus generalization of conditioned eyelid responses produced without cerebellar cortex: implications for plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei.

Tatsuya Ohyama1, William L Nores, Michael D Mauk.   

Abstract

In Pavlovian eyelid conditioning and adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, cerebellar cortex lesions fail to completely abolish previously acquired learning, indicating an additional site of plasticity in the deep cerebellar or vestibular nucleus. Three forms of plasticity are known to occur in the deep cerebellar nuclei: formation of new synapses, plasticity at existing synapses, and changes in intrinsic excitability. Only a cell-wide increase in excitability predicts that learning should generalize broadly from a training stimulus to other stimuli capable of supporting learning, whereas the alternatives predict that learning should be relatively specific to the training stimulus. Here we show that deep nucleus plasticity, as assessed by conditioned eyelid responses produced without input from the cerebellar cortex, is relatively specific to the training conditioned stimulus (CS). We trained rabbits to a tone or light CS with periorbital stimulation as the unconditioned stimulus (US), and pharmacologically disconnected the cerebellar cortex during a posttraining generalization test. The short-latency conditioned responses unmasked by this treatment showed strong decrement along the dimension of auditory frequency and did not generalize across stimulus modalities. These results cannot be explained solely by a cell-wide increase in the excitability of deep nucleus neurons, and imply that an input-specific mechanism in the deep cerebellar nucleus operates as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557607      PMCID: PMC218000          DOI: 10.1101/lm.67103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  40 in total

Review 1.  Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing.

Authors:  J F Medina; M D Mauk
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum.

Authors:  M D Mauk; N H Donegan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao; Lu Chen; Jeansok J Kim; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Regulation of firing response gain by calcium-dependent mechanisms in vestibular nucleus neurons.

Authors:  Marianne R Smith; Alexandra B Nelson; Sascha Du Lac
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A mechanism for savings in the cerebellum.

Authors:  J F Medina; K S Garcia; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Synaptic plasticity in the medial vestibular nuclei: role of glutamate receptors and retrograde messengers in rat brainstem slices.

Authors:  S Grassi; V E Pettorossi
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 7.  Beyond parallel fiber LTD: the diversity of synaptic and non-synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum.

Authors:  C Hansel; D J Linden; E D'Angelo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Dynamical working memory and timed responses: the role of reverberating loops in the olivo-cerebellar system.

Authors:  Werner M Kistler; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Synapse formation is associated with memory storage in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; John H Freeman; Rochelle Bruneau; Brian C Nolan; Natalie R Cooper; Alison Zook; Drew Walters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparison of single unit responses to tone, light, and compound conditioned stimuli during rabbit classical eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  J A Tracy; G B Britton; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.877

View more
  16 in total

1.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Lock-and-key mechanisms of cerebellar memory recall based on rebound currents.

Authors:  Daniel Z Wetmore; Eran A Mukamel; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cerebellar inactivation impairs memory of learned prism gaze-reach calibrations.

Authors:  Scott A Norris; Emily N Hathaway; Jordan A Taylor; W Thomas Thach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellar cortex contributions to the expression and timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tobin Davis; Tatsuya Ohyama; Frank Riusech; William L Nores; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Diversity and dynamism in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Chris I De Zeeuw; Stephen G Lisberger; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Population coding in the cerebellum: a machine learning perspective.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  Nothing can be coincidence: synaptic inhibition and plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  Jason R Pugh; Indira M Raman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Mechanisms of potentiation of mossy fiber EPSCs in the cerebellar nuclei by coincident synaptic excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  Jason R Pugh; Indira M Raman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Medial auditory thalamic input to the lateral pontine nuclei is necessary for auditory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.