Literature DB >> 11726236

Comparison of single unit responses to tone, light, and compound conditioned stimuli during rabbit classical eyeblink conditioning.

J A Tracy1, G B Britton, J E Steinmetz.   

Abstract

Unit recordings and lesion studies have implicated the cerebellum as an essential site for the acquisition and maintenance of the conditioned eyeblink response. The current study looked at the neural characteristics of conditioned stimulus (CS) processing in the interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum after training New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in one of two conditioning paradigms: (a) compound conditioning (CMP), a compound CS consisting of light and tone paired with an air puff unconditioned stimulus (US); or (b) stimulus compounding (ALT), alternating blocks of tone CS and light CS trials paired with the air puff US. Single unit responses were recorded during five sessions after the animals had reached an asymptotic level of responding. Animals were tested for behavioral and neural responses to CS alone trials that included tone alone, light alone, and compound tone-light trials. For the CMP group, the compound CS elicited 80 to 90% conditioned eyeblink responses (CRs), whereas the individual tone and light CSs elicited only 40 to 50% CRs. For the ALT group, all three CSs (tone, light, and compound) elicited very high levels of responding of at least 80% CRs. For the CMP group, there were roughly equal numbers of cells responding to all of the CSs. This includes cells that responded exclusively to one, and only one, of the three stimuli and also those cells that responded to combinations of two or more. Cells from the ALT group were far more likely to respond exclusively to only one of the CSs. Both the behavioral and physiological results suggest that the compound tone-light stimulus was processed as a distinct stimulus, separate from the component tone and light. These results are discussed in the context of multisensory processing. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11726236     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2001.4024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  14 in total

1.  fMRI of the conscious rabbit during unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning reveals bilateral cerebellar activation.

Authors:  Michael J Miller; Nan-kuei Chen; Limin Li; Brian Tom; Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft; Alice M Wyrwicz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Stimulus generalization of conditioned eyelid responses produced without cerebellar cortex: implications for plasticity in the cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohyama; William L Nores; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Visualizing stimulus convergence in amygdala neurons during associative learning.

Authors:  Sabiha K Barot; Yasuhiro Kyono; Emily W Clark; Ilene L Bernstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Examining the effects of former cannabis use on cerebellum-dependent eyeblink conditioning in humans.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; Chad R Edwards; Jennifer M Vollmer; Molly A Erickson; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick; Patrick D Skosnik
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Neuronal correlates of cross-modal transfer in the cerebellum and pontine nuclei.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; Alireza Kashef; Inah Lee; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Ventral lateral geniculate input to the medial pons is necessary for visual eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Associative and non-associative blinking in classically conditioned adult rats.

Authors:  Derick H Lindquist; Richard W Vogel; Joseph E Steinmetz
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-11-27

8.  Cross-modal transfer of the conditioned eyeblink response during interstimulus interval discrimination training in young rats.

Authors:  Kevin L Brown; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.038

9.  Cannabis use disrupts eyeblink conditioning: evidence for cannabinoid modulation of cerebellar-dependent learning.

Authors:  Patrick D Skosnik; Chad R Edwards; Brian F O'Donnell; Ashley Steffen; Joseph E Steinmetz; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Cerebellar inactivation impairs cross modal savings of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.