Literature DB >> 14557437

Contraceptive efficacy of a depot progestin and androgen combination in men.

Leo Turner1, Ann J Conway, Mark Jimenez, Peter Y Liu, Elise Forbes, Robert I McLachlan, David J Handelsman.   

Abstract

WHO studies provided proof of concept for hormonal male contraception using a prototype androgen-alone regimen. Combined testosterone plus progestin regimens offer more practical promise, but no contraceptive efficacy studies have been completed. The objective of this study was to establish the proof of principle for depot hormonal androgen/progestin combination as a male contraceptive. We performed a contraceptive efficacy study of 55 healthy men in stable fertile relationships seeking a change in contraceptive method. Testosterone (four 200-mg implants, every 4 or 6 months) and 300 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, im, every 3 months were administered. Once sperm output was suppressed (<1 million/ml for 2 consecutive months), men entered a 12-month contraceptive efficacy period, ceasing other contraception. The main outcome measure was contraceptive failure (pregnancy) rate. No pregnancies occurred in 426 person-months (35.5 person-years; 95% confidence limits for contraceptive failure rate, 0-8%/annum), superior to the first year failure rate of condoms, the only reversible male method. Sperm density fell rapidly, so 94% of men entered the efficacy phase by 3 months, with only 2 of 55 (3.6%) men not sufficiently suppressed to enter efficacy. A few men treated with testosterone implants at 6-month intervals demonstrated androgen deficiency symptoms and/or escape of gonadotropin and spermatogenic suppression between months 5 and 6; after a protocol amendment, all men receiving testosterone implants at 4-month intervals avoided androgen deficiency or loss of gonadotropin and sperm output suppression. Recovery was complete (median, 3.6 months to sperm reappearance and 5.0 months to 20 million sperm/ml) in all but one man with an incidental testicular disorder. Discontinuations were for protocol-related reasons (n = 15) or altered personal circumstances (n = 12), but there were no serious adverse effects related to drug exposure. The first male contraceptive efficacy study using a prototype depot androgen/progestin combination demonstrates high contraceptive efficacy with satisfactory short-term safety and recovery of spermatogenesis. Further studies of purpose-developed products are required to extend the overall safety and efficacy experience with depot androgen/progestin combinations, the most promising approach to hormonal male contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557437     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  45 in total

1.  Combined nestorone-testosterone gel suppresses serum gonadotropins to concentrations associated with effective hormonal contraception in men.

Authors:  B D Anawalt; M Y Roth; J Ceponis; V Surampudi; J K Amory; R S Swerdloff; P Y Liu; C Dart; W J Bremner; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D L Blithe; S T Page; C Wang
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 2.  Discovery and therapeutic promise of selective androgen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Jiyun Chen; Juhyun Kim; James T Dalton
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  As the world grows: contraception in the 21st century.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Mark A Baker; Gustavo F Doncel; Martin M Matzuk; Christine K Mauck; Michael J K Harper
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Characteristics associated with suppression of spermatogenesis in a male hormonal contraceptive trial using testosterone and Nestorone(®) gels.

Authors:  M Y Roth; N Ilani; C Wang; S T Page; W J Bremner; R S Swerdloff; C Dart; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D Blithe; J K Amory
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 5.  Male hormonal contraception: potential risks and benefits.

Authors:  Niloufar Ilani; Ronald S Swerdloff; Christina Wang
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Acceptability of a transdermal gel-based male hormonal contraceptive in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mara Y Roth; Grace Shih; Niloufar Ilani; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page; William J Bremner; Ronald S Swerdloff; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Diana L Blithe; John K Amory
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Hormonal male contraception: end of a dream or start of a new era?

Authors:  Eberhard Nieschlag
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Age and duration of testosterone therapy predict time to return of sperm count after human chorionic gonadotropin therapy.

Authors:  Taylor P Kohn; Matthew R Louis; Stephen M Pickett; Mark C Lindgren; Jaden R Kohn; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate and dihydrotestosterone induce coronary hyperreactivity in intact male rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Rajesh G Mishra; R Kent Hermsmeyer; Koichi Miyagawa; Philip Sarrel; Barry Uchida; Frank Z Stanczyk; Kenneth A Burry; D Roger Illingworth; Frank J Nordt
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Male contraception.

Authors:  John K Amory
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.