Literature DB >> 1455720

Failure of rivalry at low contrast: evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process.

L Liu1, C W Tyler, C M Schor.   

Abstract

Presentation of different images to the two eyes normally results in a time-varying alternation between the two images (binocular rivalry). However, we find that when orthogonal gratings are viewed dichoptically at low contrast, a stable summation between the two images is perceived in the form of a dichoptic plaid. The range of perception of the dichoptic plaid depends on spatial frequency, contrast and luminance of the gratings. This phenomenon differs from the "false fusion", a fleeting summation of different images perceived only under very brief presentation of the stimuli. The observations suggest that there exists a neural process that performs a summation of dissimilar images, and that is distinct from the competitive process of suppression and binocular rivalry.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1455720     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90203-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Binocular integration of pattern motion signals by MT neurons and by human observers.

Authors:  Chris Tailby; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Rodica Curtu; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Single units and conscious vision.

Authors:  N K Logothetis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binocular rivalry of equiluminant targets.

Authors:  D H Westendorf; M P Galupo
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

6.  Derived patterns in binocular rivalry networks.

Authors:  Casey O Diekman; Martin Golubitsky; Yunjiao Wang
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.300

7.  A search asymmetry for interocular conflict.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Ignace T C Hooge; Jeroen S Benjamins; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Bistable percepts in the brain: FMRI contrasts monocular pattern rivalry and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Samuel Jessula; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Duality in binocular rivalry: distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli.

Authors:  Chen Song; Haishan Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Binocular fusion enhances the efficiency of spot-the-difference gameplay.

Authors:  Kavitha Venkataramanan; Swanandi Gawde; Amithavikram R Hathibelagal; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.