Literature DB >> 14556801

Preimplantation aneuploidy screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implantation failure.

Leeanda Wilton1, Lucille Voullaire, Peta Sargeant, Robert Williamson, John McBain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To select chromosomally euploid embryos for transfer by analyzing single biopsied blastomeres using either fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, and 22 or comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), which provides a full karyotype.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: A large IVF unit and the research laboratory of a hospital clinical genetics unit. PATIENT(S): Twenty patients with recurrent implantation failure. INTERVENTION(S): Ovarian stimulation and IVF by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryo biopsy, and embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Chromosome normality of biopsied blastomeres and implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Comparative genomic hybridization was able to identify many chromosomal abnormalities that would have been missed if those cells had been analyzed by FISH. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer and implantation rate was 11% and 7% for embryos analyzed by FISH and 21% and 15% for embryos analyzed by CGH. CONCLUSION(S): Comparative genomic hybridization is more effective than FISH for identifying chromosomally normal embryos, which may result in a higher clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate after embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14556801     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01162-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

Review 1.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Mario Vega; Ido Sirota; Matthew Lederman; Erin L Moshier; Eric Gonzales; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques.

Authors:  Talha Al-Shawaf; Ariel Zosmer; Martha Dirnfeld; Gedis Grudzinskas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Evaluation of genome coverage and fidelity of multiple displacement amplification from single cells by SNP array.

Authors:  Jiawei Ling; Guanglun Zhuang; Barbara Tazon-Vega; Chenhui Zhang; Baoqiang Cao; Zev Rosenwaks; Kangpu Xu
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol.

Authors:  D S Johnson; G Gemelos; J Baner; A Ryan; C Cinnioglu; M Banjevic; R Ross; M Alper; B Barrett; J Frederick; D Potter; B Behr; M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.