Literature DB >> 14555591

Measuring agreement between diagnostic devices.

W Ward Flemons1, Michael R Littner.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in using portable monitoring for investigating patients with suspected sleep apnea. Research studies typically report portable monitoring results in comparison with the results of sleep laboratory-based polysomnography. A systematic review of this research has recently been completed by a joint working group of the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The methods for comparing the results of portable monitors and polysomnography include product-moment correlation, intraclass correlation, mean differences/limits of agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Each approach has advantages and limitations, which are highlighted in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555591     DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.4.1535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  23 in total

1.  Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kenneth E Freedland; Robert M Carney; Junichiro Hayano; Brian C Steinmeyer; Rebecca L Reese; Annelieke M Roest
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine--position statement. Dental sleep medicine and portable monitoring, August 2005.

Authors:  Kent E Moore; Jeffrey R Prinsell; Jonathan A Parker; Harold A Smith; Sheri Katz; Timothy D Kneller; Don A Pantino; Robert R Rogers; R Bruce Templeton
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Prevalence of High Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores in a rural population.

Authors:  P Pahwa; C P Karunanayake; L Hagel; J A Gjevre; D Rennie; J Lawson; J A Dosman
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  A portable automated assessment tool for sleep apnea using a combined Holter-oximeter.

Authors:  Conor Heneghan; Chern-Pin Chua; John F Garvey; Philip de Chazal; Redmond Shouldice; Patricia Boyle; Walter T McNicholas
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Home-based diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in an urban population.

Authors:  Natasha Garg; Andrew J Rolle; Todd A Lee; Bharati Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Two-Channel Portable Monitor to "Rule in" Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Kim L Ward; Nigel McArdle; Alan James; Alexandra P Bremner; Laila Simpson; Matthew N Cooper; Lyle J Palmer; Annette C Fedson; Sutapa Mukherjee; David R Hillman
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Accuracy of ECG-based screening for sleep-disordered breathing: a survey of all male workers in a transport company.

Authors:  Junichiro Hayano; Teruomi Tsukahara; Eiichi Watanabe; Fumihiko Sasaki; Kiyohiro Kawai; Hiroki Sakakibara; Itsuo Kodama; Tetsuo Nomiyama; Keisaku Fujimoto
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Comparison of two home sleep testing devices with different strategies for diagnosis of OSA.

Authors:  Tyler Gumb; Akosua Twumasi; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Alan Perez; Kathleen Black; David M Rapoport; Jag Sunderram; Indu Ayappa
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Validation of a self-applied unattended monitor for sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Indu Ayappa; Robert G Norman; Vijay Seelall; David M Rapoport
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Using a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea: in-laboratory and ambulatory validation.

Authors:  Stephen D Pittman; Najib T Ayas; Mary M MacDonald; Atul Malhotra; Robert B Fogel; David P White
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.