Literature DB >> 14555500

Fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Peter F Bross1, Amy Baird, Gang Chen, Josephine M Jee, Richard T Lostritto, David E Morse, Liliam A Rosario, Gene M Williams, Peiling Yang, Atiqur Rahman, Grant Williams, Richard Pazdur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer who have responded to tamoxifen (TAM) may receive additional benefit from a second endocrine agent after progression or relapse after TAM therapy. Fulvestrant (FVT; Faslodex; i.m. injection, ICI 182,780; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) was developed as a selective antagonist of estrogen. In postmenopausal women, FVT is reported to inhibit the proliferative effects of estrogen on sensitive tissues and has no apparent measurable estrogenic activity. In this report, we describe the data and analyses supporting marketing approval for FVT by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The FDA review of 16 clinical trials and 6 pharmacokinetic trials, as well as preclinical pharmacology and chemistry data, are described. The bases for marketing approval are summarized.
RESULTS: Toxicology studies in the mouse, rat, and dog showed minimal toxicity except for antiestrogenic effects. Because of FVT aqueous insolubility, an i.m. formulation, given at monthly intervals, was selected for clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated sustained concentrations with monthly injection. In in vitro studies FVT was extensively metabolized, primarily by hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4. Phase I studies showed minimal toxicity, and the maximal dose (250 mg) was limited by FVT solubility. In two Phase III trials, 851 patients were randomized to either 250 mg FVT i.m. monthly or to anastrozole (ANZ) 1 mg p.o. daily. Ninety-six percent of patients had received TAM previously for early (adjuvant treatment) or advanced breast cancer. Response rates (RR) were 17% for both FVT and ANZ study arms in the North American trial, and were 20% versus 15% for FVT versus ANZ, respectively, in the European trial. There were no observed differences between study arms with respect to time to progression or survival. The most common FVT adverse events reported as potentially treatment-related were injection site reactions and hot flashes.
CONCLUSIONS: FVT was approved on April 25, 2002 by the FDA for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression after antiestrogen therapy. The recommended dose is 250 mg i.m. monthly as a single 5 ml injection or as two concurrent 2.5 ml injections into the buttocks. Approval was based on results of two randomized trials comparing response rates and time to progression of FVT- and ANZ-treated patients. Complete prescribing information is available on the FDA website.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

Review 1.  Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm.

Authors:  Ashton C Lai; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Antiestrogens and the formation of DNA damage in rats: a comparison.

Authors:  Sung Yeon Kim; Naomi Suzuki; Y R Santosh Laxmi; Atsushi Umemoto; Tomonari Matsuda; Shinya Shibutani
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Fulvestrant decreases anastrozole drug concentrations when taken concurrently by patients with metastatic breast cancer treated on SWOG study S0226.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; William E Barlow; Kelley M Kidwell; Kathy S Albain; Ted A Vandenberg; Shaker R Dakhil; Nagendra R Tirumali; Robert B Livingston; Julie Gralow; Daniel F Hayes; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Rita S Mehta; James M Rae
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Exploiting Signaling Pathways Implicated in Endocrine Resistance.

Authors:  Adam M Brufsky; Maura N Dickler
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-19

Review 5.  Estrogen receptor-beta and breast cancer: translating biology into clinical practice.

Authors:  Yuet-Kin Leung; Ming-Tsung Lee; Hung-Ming Lam; Pheruza Tarapore; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Effects of estrogen receptor antagonist on biological behavior and expression of growth factors in the prolactinoma MMQ cell line.

Authors:  Hongtao Lv; Chuzhong Li; Songbai Gui; Meizhen Sun; Dan Li; Yazhuo Zhang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Non-nuclear estrogen receptor alpha activation in endothelium reduces cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.

Authors:  Sara Menazza; Junhui Sun; Swathi Appachi; Ken L Chambliss; Sung Hoon Kim; Angel Aponte; Sohaib Khan; John A Katzenellenbogen; Benita S Katzenellenbogen; Philip W Shaul; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Andrographolide Inhibits ER-Positive Breast Cancer Growth and Enhances Fulvestrant Efficacy via ROS-FOXM1-ER-α Axis.

Authors:  Tong Xu; Yanyu Jiang; Shuying Yuan; Li Zhang; Xihui Chen; Weili Zhao; Lili Cai; Biying Xiao; Lijun Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Ligands specify estrogen receptor alpha nuclear localization and degradation.

Authors:  Silvia Kocanova; Mahta Mazaheri; Stéphanie Caze-Subra; Kerstin Bystricky
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  During hormone depletion or tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer cells the estrogen receptor apoprotein supports cell cycling through the retinoic acid receptor α1 apoprotein.

Authors:  Marcela D Salazar; Maya Ratnam; Mugdha Patki; Ivana Kisovic; Robert Trumbly; Mohamed Iman; Manohar Ratnam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.