A Tezvergil1, L V J Lassila, P K Vallittu. 1. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials Research, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. arztez@utu.fi
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recently, new products have been introduced to repair composite restorations that may be used as 'one-step' primers or monomers and silane compounds which are used separately as 'multi-step' primers. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of the new composite resin to aged composite, by using different adhesion primers. METHODS: The substrates were particulate filler composite (Z250, 3M-ESPE), which was aged by boiling for 8 h and storing at 37 degrees C in water for 3 weeks. The aged substrate surfaces were wet-ground flat with 320-grit silicon carbide paper and subjected randomly (n=8) to either one-step adhesion primer: Compoconnect (CC) (Heraus Kulzer), or multi-step: Clearfil Repair (CF) (Kuraray) or an intermediate resin: Scothchbond Multi-purpose adhesive resin (3M-ESPE) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. Specimens with no surface treatment were used as control (C). New composite resin (Z250) was added to the substrate using 2 mm layer increments and light cured. The specimens were either water stored for 48 h or water stored for 24 h and then thermocycled for 6000 cycles. The shear bond strengths were measured with a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min using a universal testing machine. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (p=0.05). RESULTS: All surface treatment methods showed significant difference compared to control (p<0.05). CF showed higher bond strength than CC and MP (p<0.05). Storage condition did not show a significant difference (p>0.05) in bond strength values. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that multi-step adhesion primer yielded higher bond strength compared to one-step primer or intermediate resin.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Recently, new products have been introduced to repair composite restorations that may be used as 'one-step' primers or monomers and silane compounds which are used separately as 'multi-step' primers. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of the new composite resin to aged composite, by using different adhesion primers. METHODS: The substrates were particulate filler composite (Z250, 3M-ESPE), which was aged by boiling for 8 h and storing at 37 degrees C in water for 3 weeks. The aged substrate surfaces were wet-ground flat with 320-grit silicon carbide paper and subjected randomly (n=8) to either one-step adhesion primer: Compoconnect (CC) (Heraus Kulzer), or multi-step: Clearfil Repair (CF) (Kuraray) or an intermediate resin: Scothchbond Multi-purpose adhesive resin (3M-ESPE) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. Specimens with no surface treatment were used as control (C). New composite resin (Z250) was added to the substrate using 2 mm layer increments and light cured. The specimens were either water stored for 48 h or water stored for 24 h and then thermocycled for 6000 cycles. The shear bond strengths were measured with a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min using a universal testing machine. Data were analysed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests (p=0.05). RESULTS: All surface treatment methods showed significant difference compared to control (p<0.05). CF showed higher bond strength than CC and MP (p<0.05). Storage condition did not show a significant difference (p>0.05) in bond strength values. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that multi-step adhesion primer yielded higher bond strength compared to one-step primer or intermediate resin.
Authors: Batu Can Yaman; Begüm Güray Efes; Can Dörter; Yavuz Gömeç; Dina Erdilek; Oktay Yazıcıoğlu Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.161