OBJECTIVE: To analyze what FIO2 can be reached, and how long it takes using the different autoinflated resuscitation bags and increasing oxygen flows. DESIGN: Experimental analysis on the effect of three different models of autoinflated resuscitation bag and increasing oxygen flows in the final FIO2, and time spent to reach it. SETTING: Laboratory, with a gas analyzer and a lung simulator to measure inspired FIO2. INTERVENTIONS: Simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Three different autoinflated resuscitation bags were studied; A, the classic one with oxygen delivery directly into the bag, without reservoir, B, a new one without the reservoir device; and C, a new one with the reservoir device properly implemented. Increasing oxygen flows were administered until FIO2 stabilized. RESULTS: With model A the maximum FIO2 reached was 0.73 in 70 s using a 20 l/min oxygen flow. With model B the maximum FIO2 reached was 0.65 in 90 s using a 20 l/min oxygen flow. The best FIO2 (0.99) was reached using model C in 55 s with 12 l/min oxygen flow. In the three models a high correlation between oxygen flow and FIO2 was found (r>0.8). CONCLUSIONS: It is mandatory to use model C resuscitation autoinflated bag with 12 l/min of oxygen flow during the resuscitation maneuvers. Using another autoinflated bag model, maximum oxygen flows (i.e., 20 l/min) are needed. The resuscitation autoinflated bags showed less effectiveness when they were not properly assembled.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze what FIO2 can be reached, and how long it takes using the different autoinflated resuscitation bags and increasing oxygen flows. DESIGN: Experimental analysis on the effect of three different models of autoinflated resuscitation bag and increasing oxygen flows in the final FIO2, and time spent to reach it. SETTING: Laboratory, with a gas analyzer and a lung simulator to measure inspired FIO2. INTERVENTIONS: Simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Three different autoinflated resuscitation bags were studied; A, the classic one with oxygen delivery directly into the bag, without reservoir, B, a new one without the reservoir device; and C, a new one with the reservoir device properly implemented. Increasing oxygen flows were administered until FIO2 stabilized. RESULTS: With model A the maximum FIO2 reached was 0.73 in 70 s using a 20 l/min oxygen flow. With model B the maximum FIO2 reached was 0.65 in 90 s using a 20 l/min oxygen flow. The best FIO2 (0.99) was reached using model C in 55 s with 12 l/min oxygen flow. In the three models a high correlation between oxygen flow and FIO2 was found (r>0.8). CONCLUSIONS: It is mandatory to use model C resuscitation autoinflated bag with 12 l/min of oxygen flow during the resuscitation maneuvers. Using another autoinflated bag model, maximum oxygen flows (i.e., 20 l/min) are needed. The resuscitation autoinflated bags showed less effectiveness when they were not properly assembled.
Authors: M Winkler; W Mauritz; W Hackl; H Gilly; M Weindlmayr-Goettel; K Steinbereithner; I Schindler Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: R A Berg; D Wilcoxson; R W Hilwig; K B Kern; A B Sanders; C W Otto; D K Eklund; G A Ewy Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 5.721