Literature DB >> 10838236

Arterial blood-gases with 500- versus 1000-ml tidal volumes during out-of-hospital CPR.

A Langhelle1, K Sunde, L Wik, P A Steen.   

Abstract

The correct tidal volume during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is presently debated. While the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and American Heart Association (AHA) previously recommended a tidal volume of 800-1200 ml, the ERC has recently reduced this to 400-600 ml. In a prospective, randomised study of 17 non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients intubated and mechanically ventilated 12 min(-1) with 100% oxygen, we have therefore compared arterial blood gases generated with tidal volumes of 500 and 1000 ml. Mean time from cardiac arrest to arrival of the ambulance was 13+/-8 and 14+/-8 min in the two groups, respectively. Arterial blood samples were taken percutaneously 5 and 10-15 min after onset of the mechanical ventilation and analysed instantly. Pa(CO(2)) was significantly higher for a tidal volume of 500 than 1000 ml at both 5 and 10-15 min, 7.48+/-2.23 versus 3.70+/-0.83 kPa (P=0.002) and 7. 45+/-1.19 versus 3.98+/-1.58 kPa (P<0.001). The pH was lower for 500 than 1000 ml at 10-15 min, 7.01+/-0.10 versus 7.20+/-0.17 (P=0.034), with a strong trend in the same direction at 5 min (P=0.06). There was adequate oxygenation with no differences in Pa(O(2)) or BE at any time between the two groups, and no significant differences in any blood gas variables between the 5- and 10-15-min samples. We conclude that arterial normocapnia is not achieved with either tidal volume during advanced life support with non-rebreathing ventilation at 12 min(-1). What ventilation volume is required for CO(2) removal and oxygenation during basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation cannot be extrapolated from the present data. In that situation the risk of gastric inflation, regurgitation and aspiration must also be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10838236     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00162-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  4 in total

1.  Maximum FIO2 in minimum time depending on the kind of resuscitation bag and oxygen flow.

Authors:  Salvador Quintana; Jesús Martínez Pérez; Manuel Alvarez; Joan Salvador Vila; Fernando Jara; Juan Manuel Nava
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  ["Topless" cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fashion or science?].

Authors:  K Markstaller; B Eberle; W F Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Performance of manual ventilation: how to define its efficiency in bench studies? A review of the literature.

Authors:  A Khoury; A De Luca; F S Sall; L Pazart; G Capellier
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2: Adult basic life support.

Authors: 
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.